How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? The Results of a Comprehensive EvaluationMore than 2 million adults are incarcerated in U.S. prisons, and each year more than 700,000 leave federal and state prisons and return to communities. Unfortunately, within three years, 40 percent will be reincarcerated. One reason for this is that ex-offenders lack the knowledge, training, and skills to support a successful return to communities. Trying to reduce such high recidivism rates is partly why states devote resources to educating and training individuals in prison. This raises the question of how effective -- and cost-effective -- correctional education is: an even more salient question given the funding environment states face from the 2008 recession and its continuing aftermath. With funding from the Second Chance Act of 2007, the Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Justice, asked RAND to help answer this question as part of a comprehensive examination of the current state of correctional education for incarcerated adults and juveniles. The RAND team conducted a systematic review of correctional education programs for incarcerated adults and juveniles. This included a meta-analysis on correctional education's effects on recidivism and postrelease employment outcomes for incarcerated adults, as well as a synthesis of evidence on programs for juveniles. The study also included a nationwide survey of state correctional education directors to understand how correctional education is provided today and the recession's impact. The authors also compared the direct costs of correctional education with those of reincarceration to put the recidivism findings into a broader context. |
Contents
Introduction | 1 |
How Effective Is Correctional Education for Incarcerated Adults? | 7 |
A Systematic Review of Correctional Education Programs for Incarcerated Juveniles | 21 |
RAND Correctional Education Survey | 57 |
Conclusions and Recommendations | 81 |
Appendixes | 91 |
117 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic programs adult inmates analysis assess average Avon Park baseline classroom closed-circuit television comparison group computer-assisted instruction computer-based testing correctional education directors correctional education programs correctional education system Corrective Reading costs decrease differences effect sizes effectiveness of correctional eligible studies evaluation Fast ForWord federal findings Fiscal focused funding GED completion GED exam high school implement incarcerated adults incarcerated youth included inmates who participated instructors Internet intervention Justice juvenile correctional education juvenile correctional facilities Juvenile Correctional Settings juvenile offenders level-5 literature Maryland Scale medium-sized and large number of students Overall participation in correctional percent percentage points postrelease employment postsecondary education randomized trials recidivism release reported research designs rigorous selection bias single-case design skills standard deviation state’s correctional education statistically significant survey systematic review test scores tion total number treatment and comparison treatment group U.S. Census Bureau U.S. Department vocational education/CTE programs vocational training