Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education

Front Cover
Richard A. Lesh, Eric Hamilton, James J. Kaput
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007 - Education - 476 pages
The central question addressed in Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education is this:
 
What kind of understandings and abilities should be emphasized to decrease mismatches between the narrow band of mathematical understandings and abilities that are emphasized in mathematics classrooms and tests, and those that are needed for success beyond school in the 21st century?
 
This is an urgent question. In fields ranging from aeronautical engineering to agriculture, and from biotechnologies to business administration, outside advisors to future-oriented university programs increasingly emphasize the fact that, beyond school, the nature of problem-solving activities has changed dramatically during the past twenty years, as powerful tools for computation, conceptualization, and communication have led to fundamental changes in the levels and types of mathematical understandings and abilities that are needed for success in such fields.
 
For K-12 students and teachers, questions about the changing nature of mathematics (and mathematical thinking beyond school) might be rephrased to ask: If the goal is to create a mathematics curriculum that will be adequate to prepare students for informed citizenship—as well as preparing them for career opportunities in learning organizations, in knowledge economies, in an age of increasing globalization—how should traditional conceptions of the 3Rs be extended or reconceived? Overall, this book suggests that it is not enough to simply make incremental changes in the existing curriculum whose traditions developed out of the needs of industrial societies. The authors, beyond simply stating conclusions from their research, use results from it to describe promising directions for a research agenda related to this question.
 
The volume is organized in three sections:
*Part I focuses on naturalistic observations aimed at clarifying what kind of “mathematical thinking” people really do when they are engaged in “real life” problem solving or decision making situations beyond school.
*Part II shifts attention toward changes that have occurred in kinds of elementary-but-powerful mathematical concepts, topics, and tools that have evolved recently—and that could replace past notions of  “basics” by providing new foundations for the future. This section also initiates discussions about what it means to “understand” the preceding ideas and abilities.
*Part III extends these discussions about meaning and understanding—and emphasizes teaching experiments aimed at investigating how instructional activities can be designed to facilitate the development of the preceding ideas and abilities.
 
Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education is an essential reference for researchers, curriculum developers, assessment experts, and teacher educators across the fields of mathematics and science education.

Other editions - View all

About the author (2007)

James J. Kaput was a professor in the department of mathematics, at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. He was originally trained in mathematics (Category Theory), and became interested during the '70s in teaching teachers and reforming undergraduate education, and in the representational side of student learning. Under the auspices of the National Center for Research in Mathematical Sciences Education at Wisconsin, Dr. Kaput led efforts to understand how the core math curriculum might be fundamentally reorganized to democratize access to big ideas such as algebra and calculus. As part of this, he chaired the Early Algebra Research Group of NCRMSE's OERI-funded successor, and was an active researcher and leader in the development of algebraic reasoning in elementary grades mathematics. His NSF-funded SimCalc Project involved designing simulations for the learning of the fundamental ideas underlying calculus beginning at the middle school level prior to the learning of formal algebra. Dr. Kaput was on the editorial board of six mathematics education journals and was a founding co-editor of a new series of volumes sponsored by the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences on Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education. He was on many R& D project advisory boards, a consultant to a variety of federal education programs, and a frequent invited speaker at national and international meetings.David Carraher, senior scientist, TERC, is PI of the Early Algebra, Early Arithmetic Project and director of research for the Fulcrum Institute Project. His research looks at the long-term evolution of students' mathematical and scientific concepts, especially withrespect to how student thining meshes or clashes with canonical knowledge. Recent publications co-authored with A.D. Schliemann, cover topics such as "The transfer dilemma" (J.Learn.Sci., 2002), "The evolution of mathematical reasoning: everyday vs. idealized reasoning "(Devel. Rev., 2002), "Culture and Cognition" (in Matsumoto, 2002), and "Modeling Reasoning" (in Gravemeijer et.al., 2002). From his early work as professor of psychology and co-founder of the Learning Through Thinking Project in Brazil, through his recent work in introducing algebra to 8-11 year old students, Dr. Carraher has searched for research-grounded ways to improve mathematics and science education based upon how students reason. His books include "Street Mathematics and School Mathematics" (Nunes, Schliemann et al. 1993) and "Bringing Out the Algebraic Character of Arithmetic," (Schliemann, Carraher, & Brizuela, 2006).Maria Blanton is an associate professor of mathematics education in the department of mathematics, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. Dr. Blanton is a mathematics educator whose research interests include both teaching and learning algebra in the elementary grades and the application of sociocultural theory in teaching and learning proof in undergraduate classrooms. Her particular focus in early algebra education has been on children's functional thinking and characteristics of classroom teaching practice that build elementary students' algebraic thinking. As PI on the project "Understanding Linkages Between Social And Cognitive Aspects Of Undergraduate Students' Transition to Mathematical Proof," she also studies how undergraduate students internalize public discourse and symbolizationsabout proof and argumentation and how teacher discourse supports this. Dr. Blanton has published numerous articles and invited chapters in mathematics education and has presented her research at over 50 national and international conferences.

Bibliographic information