Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 1, Parts 1-2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2004 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 99
... Comparison , 14.3 m Draft Surge RAO ( m / m ) 1.2 1.0 Head 0.8 Quat Beam 06 0.4 02 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Period ( s ) RAO Comparison , 14.3 m Draft 1.2 1.0 Head 0.8 Quat Beam 06 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 Period ( s ) RAO Comparison , 14.3 ...
... Comparison , 14.3 m Draft Surge RAO ( m / m ) 1.2 1.0 Head 0.8 Quat Beam 06 0.4 02 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Period ( s ) RAO Comparison , 14.3 m Draft 1.2 1.0 Head 0.8 Quat Beam 06 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 Period ( s ) RAO Comparison , 14.3 ...
Page 456
... comparison are listed in Table 12. These values correspond to S - N curves in air or , arguably , to S - N curves in sea water with cathodic protection [ 14-15 ] . Table 12. Logoa values , S - N curves employed in fatigue comparison ...
... comparison are listed in Table 12. These values correspond to S - N curves in air or , arguably , to S - N curves in sea water with cathodic protection [ 14-15 ] . Table 12. Logoa values , S - N curves employed in fatigue comparison ...
Page 512
... Comparison of Maximum Line Loads of HRW and MOTSIM Data – 143 ft Draft 8.2 knot Flood Intact The comparison between MOTSIM and HRW results on the maximum line tensions for the flood case is not good , especially for lines # 25 through ...
... Comparison of Maximum Line Loads of HRW and MOTSIM Data – 143 ft Draft 8.2 knot Flood Intact The comparison between MOTSIM and HRW results on the maximum line tensions for the flood case is not good , especially for lines # 25 through ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis ASME axial barge caisson calculated Campos Basin catenary coefficient comparison computed Conference on Offshore configuration Copyright damping deck diameter diffraction displacement draft drag drag coefficient dynamic effect equations Figure finite element flow fluid force FPSO frequency domain heave hot spot stress hull hydrodynamic installation interaction jacket kips linear load load transfer located longitudinal maximum measured Mechanics and Arctic method mode model test Model-I mooring lines mooring system motion nonlinear numerical obtained Offshore Mechanics offshore structures parameters peak performed Petrobras pipe platform polyester predicted pressure ratio Rayleigh distribution response Reynolds number riser Riser Tensioning S-N curve seastates shear shown in Fig simulation soil spectral spectrum spudcan steel stiffness subsea Table transverse upstream cylinder values velocity velocity potential vertical vessel vibration vortex vortex induced vibrations water depth wave height Weibull distribution Y Force