Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 1, Parts 1-2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2004 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 86
Page 108
The aim was to eliminate the effects caused by additional driving force and rapid
installation , allowing for any changes in suction pressure to be evaluated solely
due to differences in geometry . As shown , caissons with larger UD require ...
The aim was to eliminate the effects caused by additional driving force and rapid
installation , allowing for any changes in suction pressure to be evaluated solely
due to differences in geometry . As shown , caissons with larger UD require ...
Page 120
Because they are 2D , we have to compare the pressures along a line ( line
segment AB , see Figure 19 ) . The first ... A similar decay in pressure from A
towards B ( halfway the wall ) is observed ( see Figure 20 ) , albeit not as large as
in the ...
Because they are 2D , we have to compare the pressures along a line ( line
segment AB , see Figure 19 ) . The first ... A similar decay in pressure from A
towards B ( halfway the wall ) is observed ( see Figure 20 ) , albeit not as large as
in the ...
Page 238
Maximum Service Life 20 years 20 MPa Maximum Design Pressure ( 3 , 625 psi )
Maximum Hoop Stress in 4 . 1 ( i ) 0 . 365 , FRP at Design Pressure 4 . 1 ( i )
Maximum Hoop Stress in 0 . 6S ; FRP at Hydrotest Pressure 5 . 7 ( a ) ( 5 ) ,
Minimum ...
Maximum Service Life 20 years 20 MPa Maximum Design Pressure ( 3 , 625 psi )
Maximum Hoop Stress in 4 . 1 ( i ) 0 . 365 , FRP at Design Pressure 4 . 1 ( i )
Maximum Hoop Stress in 0 . 6S ; FRP at Hydrotest Pressure 5 . 7 ( a ) ( 5 ) ,
Minimum ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis applied approach ASME barge caisson calculated coefficient compared comparison computational configuration considered Copyright corresponding coupled cylinder damage damping deck depth determined developed diameter direction displacement distribution domain draft drag dynamic effect element Engineering equation experimental fatigue field Figure flow fluid force frequency function given Guide heave height higher hydrodynamic increase installation International jacket kips length limit linear load lower maximum mean measured Mechanics method mode mooring motion noise nonlinear obtained Offshore operation parameters peak performed period pipe platform position Predicted presented pressure probability production random range ratio relative represent respectively response riser roll shown shows simulation soil solution spudcan steel stress structure surface Table tension term transverse upper values velocity vertical vessel vibration wave
Bibliographic information
| Title | Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 1, Parts 1-2 |
| Contributors | OMAE Conference Committee, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Division |
| Publisher | American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2004 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | 4 Dec 2007 |
| ISBN | 0791837432, 9780791837436 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |