Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 64State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1990 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 33
Page 192
with very specific exceptions , those provisions of the Connecticut General Statutes that purport to regulate employee health care plans subject to ERISA are preempted and , therefore , are unenforceable . I. ERISA's REGULATION OF ...
with very specific exceptions , those provisions of the Connecticut General Statutes that purport to regulate employee health care plans subject to ERISA are preempted and , therefore , are unenforceable . I. ERISA's REGULATION OF ...
Page 204
62 63 C. Laws Regulating Plans Exempt From ERISA State laws relating to employee benefit plans are not preempted by ERISA if the plans to which they relate are exempted from ERISA's coverage . Among others , employee benefit plans ...
62 63 C. Laws Regulating Plans Exempt From ERISA State laws relating to employee benefit plans are not preempted by ERISA if the plans to which they relate are exempted from ERISA's coverage . Among others , employee benefit plans ...
Page 211
Preemption of the Connecticut Statutes resolves any conflicts by rendering the Connecticut Statutes unenforceable with respect to plans subject to ERISA.58 Even where there is no conflict with COBRA , the Connecticut Statutes do not ...
Preemption of the Connecticut Statutes resolves any conflicts by rendering the Connecticut Statutes unenforceable with respect to plans subject to ERISA.58 Even where there is no conflict with COBRA , the Connecticut Statutes do not ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT REVIEW Wesley W Horton | 1 |
SURVEY OF 1988 CONNECTICUT | 11 |
CONNECTICUT PROBATE LAW 1989 M Katherine Glassman | 43 |
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acquisition action addition adopted agency agreement allows amended amount appeal Appellate Court apply Association authority award banks benefit Board cause child claim Commission Commissioner concerning Conn Connecticut considered constitutional consumer continued contract corporation coverage damages decision defendant Department determined directors effect employee ERISA established evidence exemption fact federal filed finding hazardous held holding imposed income individual interest involved issue judgment legislation liability limited notice offer officer operation partnership party payment period permit person plaintiff practice prior protection reasonable received records regulations responsibility result rule securities Sess shareholders specific standard Stat statute statutory Super Supp supra note Supreme Court termination tort transaction transfer trial United violation waste