Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 64State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1990 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 70
Page 218
In United States v . Wade , 25 a company owner who had transported hazardous substances to a disposal facility argued that he could not be held individually liable under CERCLA for acts he performed in his capacity as president of the ...
In United States v . Wade , 25 a company owner who had transported hazardous substances to a disposal facility argued that he could not be held individually liable under CERCLA for acts he performed in his capacity as president of the ...
Page 219
The court stated that " in order to warrant piercing the corporate veil , the United States must allege with sufficient particularity that Sutera has so dominated the corporation that it has no will or existence of its own .
The court stated that " in order to warrant piercing the corporate veil , the United States must allege with sufficient particularity that Sutera has so dominated the corporation that it has no will or existence of its own .
Page 233
111 108 See e.g. United States v . Frezzo Bros. , Inc. , 602 F.2d 1123 ( 3d Cir . 1979 ) , 444 U.S. 1074 ( 1980 ) ; U.S. v . Oxford Royal Mushroom Products , Inc. , 487 F. Supp . 852 ( E.D. Pa . 1980 ) .
111 108 See e.g. United States v . Frezzo Bros. , Inc. , 602 F.2d 1123 ( 3d Cir . 1979 ) , 444 U.S. 1074 ( 1980 ) ; U.S. v . Oxford Royal Mushroom Products , Inc. , 487 F. Supp . 852 ( E.D. Pa . 1980 ) .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT REVIEW Wesley W Horton | 1 |
SURVEY OF 1988 CONNECTICUT | 11 |
CONNECTICUT PROBATE LAW 1989 M Katherine Glassman | 43 |
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acquisition action addition adopted agency agreement allows amended amount appeal Appellate Court apply Association authority award banks benefit Board cause child claim Commission Commissioner concerning Conn Connecticut considered constitutional consumer continued contract corporation coverage damages decision defendant Department determined directors effect employee ERISA established evidence exemption fact federal filed finding hazardous held holding imposed income individual interest involved issue judgment legislation liability limited notice offer officer operation partnership party payment period permit person plaintiff practice prior protection reasonable received records regulations responsibility result rule securities Sess shareholders specific standard Stat statute statutory Super Supp supra note Supreme Court termination tort transaction transfer trial United violation waste