Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 64State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1990 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 74
Page 137
Also of note is the Supreme Court's ruling that any assessment of comparative responsibility among co - defendants as to their percentage of liability to the plaintiff is not determinative of the liability one co - defendant may have to ...
Also of note is the Supreme Court's ruling that any assessment of comparative responsibility among co - defendants as to their percentage of liability to the plaintiff is not determinative of the liability one co - defendant may have to ...
Page 59
Under the proportional rule , a non - settling defendant is barred from seeking contribution against the settling defendants . However , at trial , the jury is required to determine the percentage of culpability of the non - settling ...
Under the proportional rule , a non - settling defendant is barred from seeking contribution against the settling defendants . However , at trial , the jury is required to determine the percentage of culpability of the non - settling ...
Page 394
The jury found that no express employment contract existed between plaintiff and defendant , but that an implied in fact agreement existed under which plaintiff could only be terminated for just cause . " The evidence of plaintiff's ...
The jury found that no express employment contract existed between plaintiff and defendant , but that an implied in fact agreement existed under which plaintiff could only be terminated for just cause . " The evidence of plaintiff's ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT REVIEW Wesley W Horton | 1 |
SURVEY OF 1988 CONNECTICUT | 11 |
CONNECTICUT PROBATE LAW 1989 M Katherine Glassman | 43 |
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acquisition action addition adopted agency agreement allows amended amount appeal Appellate Court apply Association authority award banks benefit Board cause child claim Commission Commissioner concerning Conn Connecticut considered constitutional consumer continued contract corporation coverage damages decision defendant Department determined directors effect employee ERISA established evidence exemption fact federal filed finding hazardous held holding imposed income individual interest involved issue judgment legislation liability limited notice offer officer operation partnership party payment period permit person plaintiff practice prior protection reasonable received records regulations responsibility result rule securities Sess shareholders specific standard Stat statute statutory Super Supp supra note Supreme Court termination tort transaction transfer trial United violation waste