Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 64State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1990 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 69
Page 320
In light of this lack of control over the dealers ' operations , the courts found that requirements that service station ... the plaintiffs were individually responsible for the management , operation and marketing of their stations .
In light of this lack of control over the dealers ' operations , the courts found that requirements that service station ... the plaintiffs were individually responsible for the management , operation and marketing of their stations .
Page 329
Arguably , a franchisor will require separate “ good cause ” to terminate each part of the combined operation . ... that the two operations are so interrelated that the termination of one justifies the termination of the other .
Arguably , a franchisor will require separate “ good cause ” to terminate each part of the combined operation . ... that the two operations are so interrelated that the termination of one justifies the termination of the other .
Page 428
The seller has satisfied whatever conditions have been revealed through the buyer's assessment of the property and seller's operation ; b . The seller is not aware of the existence of any pending government enforcement actions of the ...
The seller has satisfied whatever conditions have been revealed through the buyer's assessment of the property and seller's operation ; b . The seller is not aware of the existence of any pending government enforcement actions of the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT REVIEW Wesley W Horton | 1 |
SURVEY OF 1988 CONNECTICUT | 11 |
CONNECTICUT PROBATE LAW 1989 M Katherine Glassman | 43 |
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acquisition action addition adopted agency agreement allows amended amount appeal Appellate Court apply Association authority award banks benefit Board cause child claim Commission Commissioner concerning Conn Connecticut considered constitutional consumer continued contract corporation coverage damages decision defendant Department determined directors effect employee ERISA established evidence exemption fact federal filed finding hazardous held holding imposed income individual interest involved issue judgment legislation liability limited notice offer officer operation partnership party payment period permit person plaintiff practice prior protection reasonable received records regulations responsibility result rule securities Sess shareholders specific standard Stat statute statutory Super Supp supra note Supreme Court termination tort transaction transfer trial United violation waste