Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 64State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1990 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 34
Regulation D , at the time of its adoption , was a combination of six rules . Rule 501 was a definitional rule ; Rule 502 established the conditions of the offering , such as limitations on resale , information to be furnished to ...
Regulation D , at the time of its adoption , was a combination of six rules . Rule 501 was a definitional rule ; Rule 502 established the conditions of the offering , such as limitations on resale , information to be furnished to ...
Page 61
According to Kaypro , since the settling defendants pay the plaintiff voluntarily , this scenario does not violate the single satisfaction rule . “ However , it may in a rare instance provide the plaintiff with a windfall .
According to Kaypro , since the settling defendants pay the plaintiff voluntarily , this scenario does not violate the single satisfaction rule . “ However , it may in a rare instance provide the plaintiff with a windfall .
Page 63
This rule may not be analogous , however , in that Section 36498 ( a ) is based on Section 12 ( 2 ) of the Securities Act of 1933,45 not Rule 10b - 5 , and the contribution rule contained in Section 36-498 ( c ) is not consistent with ...
This rule may not be analogous , however , in that Section 36498 ( a ) is based on Section 12 ( 2 ) of the Securities Act of 1933,45 not Rule 10b - 5 , and the contribution rule contained in Section 36-498 ( c ) is not consistent with ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT REVIEW Wesley W Horton | 1 |
SURVEY OF 1988 CONNECTICUT | 11 |
CONNECTICUT PROBATE LAW 1989 M Katherine Glassman | 43 |
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acquisition action addition adopted agency agreement allows amended amount appeal Appellate Court apply Association authority award banks benefit Board cause child claim Commission Commissioner concerning Conn Connecticut considered constitutional consumer continued contract corporation coverage damages decision defendant Department determined directors effect employee ERISA established evidence exemption fact federal filed finding hazardous held holding imposed income individual interest involved issue judgment legislation liability limited notice offer officer operation partnership party payment period permit person plaintiff practice prior protection reasonable received records regulations responsibility result rule securities Sess shareholders specific standard Stat statute statutory Super Supp supra note Supreme Court termination tort transaction transfer trial United violation waste