Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 69State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1995 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 137
Santoro , 33 Conn . App . 839 ( 1994 ) . Connecticut Practice Book $ 4049 , in part , states that " [ t ] he sole remedy of any party desiring the court to review an order concerning a stay of execution shall be by motion for review ...
Santoro , 33 Conn . App . 839 ( 1994 ) . Connecticut Practice Book $ 4049 , in part , states that " [ t ] he sole remedy of any party desiring the court to review an order concerning a stay of execution shall be by motion for review ...
Page 138
Marshall , 34 Conn . App : 936 ( 1994 ) ; Krafick v . ... App : 937 ( 1994 ) ; Ferraro v Ferraro , 35 Conn . ... 113 231 Conn . 168 ( 1994 ) . 114 Grayson v . Grayson , 4 Conn . App . 275 ( 1985 ) , appeal dismissed , 202 Conn .
Marshall , 34 Conn . App : 936 ( 1994 ) ; Krafick v . ... App : 937 ( 1994 ) ; Ferraro v Ferraro , 35 Conn . ... 113 231 Conn . 168 ( 1994 ) . 114 Grayson v . Grayson , 4 Conn . App . 275 ( 1985 ) , appeal dismissed , 202 Conn .
Page 336
188 Conn . 141 ( 1982 ) ; Mystic Marinelife Aquarium , Inc. v . Gill , 175 Conn . 483 ( 1978 ) ; City of New Haven v . Public Util . Comm'n , 165 Conn . 687 ( 1974 ) ; Shapiro v . Carothers , 23 Conn . App . 188 ( 1990 ) ; Arrieu v .
188 Conn . 141 ( 1982 ) ; Mystic Marinelife Aquarium , Inc. v . Gill , 175 Conn . 483 ( 1978 ) ; City of New Haven v . Public Util . Comm'n , 165 Conn . 687 ( 1974 ) ; Shapiro v . Carothers , 23 Conn . App . 188 ( 1990 ) ; Arrieu v .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities addressed administrative advancement advantaged agreement allowed amended amount Appellate Court application asked Association attorneys authority Bank believe benefits career cause claim clients Conn Connecticut consider constitutional continued corporate counsel Court held damages decision defendant designation determined disadvantaged discussed effect employer equality evidence exists F M F fact federal female attorney filed finding firm frequently gender granted indicate interest issue judge judgment jury leave legal profession liability limited majority male matter Mean ment miscellaneous motion notice offices part-time party percent permitted person plaintiff practice present Probate Court profession provides question reasonable regarding reported responsibilities result rule sample secured settings standard STAT statute Supreme Court survey tion tort trial court trust woman women