Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 69State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1995 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 28
Page 165
... policies and standards for advancement do not unfairly discriminate against women or have a disparate impact on their ... activities to develop the professional skills of women assigned to them and to prepare them for advancement .
... policies and standards for advancement do not unfairly discriminate against women or have a disparate impact on their ... activities to develop the professional skills of women assigned to them and to prepare them for advancement .
Page 183
... policies and standards for advancement do not unfairly discriminate against women or have a disparate impact on their ... activities to develop the professional skills of women assigned to them and to prepare them for advancement .
... policies and standards for advancement do not unfairly discriminate against women or have a disparate impact on their ... activities to develop the professional skills of women assigned to them and to prepare them for advancement .
Page 199
Law offices should focus on merit - based considerations in evaluating candidates for advancement rather than emphasizing only time spent in the office or number of billable hours . The CBA should explore the use of compressed work ...
Law offices should focus on merit - based considerations in evaluating candidates for advancement rather than emphasizing only time spent in the office or number of billable hours . The CBA should explore the use of compressed work ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities addressed administrative advancement advantaged agreement allowed amended amount Appellate Court application asked Association attorneys authority Bank believe benefits career cause claim clients Conn Connecticut consider constitutional continued corporate counsel Court held damages decision defendant designation determined disadvantaged discussed effect employer equality evidence exists F M F fact federal female attorney filed finding firm frequently gender granted indicate interest issue judge judgment jury leave legal profession liability limited majority male matter Mean ment miscellaneous motion notice offices part-time party percent permitted person plaintiff practice present Probate Court profession provides question reasonable regarding reported responsibilities result rule sample secured settings standard STAT statute Supreme Court survey tion tort trial court trust woman women