Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 69State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1995 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 58
Page 501
a a In Murzyn , the parties drafted the agreement together , six months prior to the marriage , using a form found in a book in the library : neither had counsel . This joint effort , with each party being equally advantaged or ...
a a In Murzyn , the parties drafted the agreement together , six months prior to the marriage , using a form found in a book in the library : neither had counsel . This joint effort , with each party being equally advantaged or ...
Page 503
The courts ' restraint in not finding changed circumstances is also reflected in their approach to the issue of the reasonableness of any particular agreement : there are no reported cases setting aside any agreement simply because it ...
The courts ' restraint in not finding changed circumstances is also reflected in their approach to the issue of the reasonableness of any particular agreement : there are no reported cases setting aside any agreement simply because it ...
Page 504
Related to the issue of interpreting the terms of an agreement is what law is to be applied when the terms of the agreement have to be construed by the court . As discussed in Lord , and to some extent in Elgar , the recitation in an ...
Related to the issue of interpreting the terms of an agreement is what law is to be applied when the terms of the agreement have to be construed by the court . As discussed in Lord , and to some extent in Elgar , the recitation in an ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities addressed administrative advancement advantaged agreement allowed amended amount Appellate Court application asked Association attorneys authority Bank believe benefits career cause claim clients Conn Connecticut consider constitutional continued corporate counsel Court held damages decision defendant designation determined disadvantaged discussed effect employer equality evidence exists F M F fact federal female attorney filed finding firm frequently gender granted indicate interest issue judge judgment jury leave legal profession liability limited majority male matter Mean ment miscellaneous motion notice offices part-time party percent permitted person plaintiff practice present Probate Court profession provides question reasonable regarding reported responsibilities result rule sample secured settings standard STAT statute Supreme Court survey tion tort trial court trust woman women