Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 69State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1995 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 54
Page 1
Norcott apparently admitted to his colleagues that he had a conflict , whereupon Chief Justice Ellen Peters referred the matter to the Judicial Review Council and the Supreme Court granted the motion for reargument without dissent .
Norcott apparently admitted to his colleagues that he had a conflict , whereupon Chief Justice Ellen Peters referred the matter to the Judicial Review Council and the Supreme Court granted the motion for reargument without dissent .
Page 16
49 50 a disputed matter is not pending before another court of competent jurisdiction and the probate court does not decline jurisdiction . * ' Prior to an initial probate hearing on the merits for such a matter , any interested person ...
49 50 a disputed matter is not pending before another court of competent jurisdiction and the probate court does not decline jurisdiction . * ' Prior to an initial probate hearing on the merits for such a matter , any interested person ...
Page 43
The trial court considered the affidavits and dismissed the case on the basis of sovereign immunity which deprived the court of subject matter jurisdiction . The Appellate Court reversed , but was in turn reversed by the Supreme Court .
The trial court considered the affidavits and dismissed the case on the basis of sovereign immunity which deprived the court of subject matter jurisdiction . The Appellate Court reversed , but was in turn reversed by the Supreme Court .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities addressed administrative advancement advantaged agreement allowed amended amount Appellate Court application asked Association attorneys authority Bank believe benefits career cause claim clients Conn Connecticut consider constitutional continued corporate counsel Court held damages decision defendant designation determined disadvantaged discussed effect employer equality evidence exists F M F fact federal female attorney filed finding firm frequently gender granted indicate interest issue judge judgment jury leave legal profession liability limited majority male matter Mean ment miscellaneous motion notice offices part-time party percent permitted person plaintiff practice present Probate Court profession provides question reasonable regarding reported responsibilities result rule sample secured settings standard STAT statute Supreme Court survey tion tort trial court trust woman women