Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 69State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1995 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 65
Page 370
a motion . " The rule does not require the filing of a legal memorandum with every motion , but instead requires that a memorandum accompany “ any motion involving disputed issues of law ... In deciding whether a motion must be ...
a motion . " The rule does not require the filing of a legal memorandum with every motion , but instead requires that a memorandum accompany “ any motion involving disputed issues of law ... In deciding whether a motion must be ...
Page 371
Such a motion may be particularly appropriate as the date for trial or an evidentiary hearing approaches and time becomes of the essence . " The first paragraph of the rule also makes it clear that the “ [ f ] ailure to submit a ...
Such a motion may be particularly appropriate as the date for trial or an evidentiary hearing approaches and time becomes of the essence . " The first paragraph of the rule also makes it clear that the “ [ f ] ailure to submit a ...
Page 372
dum opposing the motion . The memorandum should identify the motion to which it relates , for example , “ Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss . ” Filing a superfluous document entitled “ Opposition ” not only creates docket ...
dum opposing the motion . The memorandum should identify the motion to which it relates , for example , “ Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss . ” Filing a superfluous document entitled “ Opposition ” not only creates docket ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities addressed administrative advancement advantaged agreement allowed amended amount Appellate Court application asked Association attorneys authority Bank believe benefits career cause claim clients Conn Connecticut consider constitutional continued corporate counsel Court held damages decision defendant designation determined disadvantaged discussed effect employer equality evidence exists F M F fact federal female attorney filed finding firm frequently gender granted indicate interest issue judge judgment jury leave legal profession liability limited majority male matter Mean ment miscellaneous motion notice offices part-time party percent permitted person plaintiff practice present Probate Court profession provides question reasonable regarding reported responsibilities result rule sample secured settings standard STAT statute Supreme Court survey tion tort trial court trust woman women