jective may frequently either precede or follow it: as, "The man is happy;" or, "happy is the man who makes virtue his choice:" "The interview was delightful;" or "delightful was the interview."

6th, When the adjective expresses some circumstance of a substantive placed after an active verb: as, "Vanity often renders its possessor despicable." In an exclamatory sentence, the adjective generally precedes the substantive; as, "How despicable does vanity often render its possessor!"

There is sometimes great beauty, as well as force, in placing the adjective before the verb, and the substantive immediately after it: as, "Great is the Lord! just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints!"

Sometimes the word all is emphatically put after a number of particulars comprehended under it. "Ambition, interest, honour, all concurred." Sometimes a substantive, which likewise comprehends the preceding particulars, is used in conjunction with this adjective: as, "Royalists, republicans, churchmen, sectaries, courtiers, patriots, all parties, concurred in the illusion."

An adjective pronoun, in the plural number, will sometimes properly associate with a singular noun: as, "Our desire, your intention, their resignation." This association applies rather to things of an intellectual nature, than to those which are corporeal. It forms an exception to the general rule.

A substantive with its adjective is reckoned as one compounded word, whence they often take another adjective, and sometimes a third, and so on: as, "An old man; a good old man ; a very learned, judicious, good old man.'

Though the adjective always relates to a substantive, it is, in many instances, put as if it were absolute; especially where the noun has been mentioned before, or is easily understood, though not expressed: as, "I often survey the green fields, as I am very fond of green;""The wise, the virtuous, the honoured, famed, and great," that is, persons;" "The twelve," that is,

"apostles;" "Have compassion on the poor; be feet to the lame, and eyes to the blind."

Substantives are often used as adjectives. In this case, the word so used is sometimes unconnected with the substantive to which it relates; sometimes connected with it by a hyphen; and sometimes joined to it, so as to make the two words coalesce. The total separation is proper, when either of the two words is long, or when they cannot be fluently pronounced as one word: as, an adjective pronoun, a silver watch, a stone cistern: the hyphen is used, when both the words are short, and are readily pronounced as a single word: as coal-mine, cornmill, fruit-tree: the words coalesce, when they are readily pronounced together; have a long established association; and are in frequent use: as, honeycomb, gingerbread, inkhorn, Yorkshire.

Sometimes the adjective becomes a substantive, and has another adjective joined to it: as, "The chief good;" "The vast immense of space."

When an adjective has a preposition before it, the substantive being understood, it takes the nature of an adverb, and is considered as an adverb: as, "In general, in particular, in haste," &c.; that is, "Generally, particularly, hastily."

Enow was formerly used as the plural of enough: but it is now obsolete.

RULE IX.

The article a or an agrees with nouns in the fingular number only, individually or collectively: as, "A christian, an infidel, a fcore, a thousand." The definite article the may agree with nouns in the fingular and plural number: as, "The garden, the houses, the ftars."

The articles are often properly omitted: when ufed, they should be justly applied, according to their diftinct nature: as, Gold is corrupting; the fea is green; a lion is bold."

It is of the nature of both the articles to determine or limit the thing spoken of. A determines it to be one single thing of the kind, leaving it still uncertain which : the determines which it is, or of many, which they are.

The following passage will serve as an example of the différent uses of a and the, and of the force of the substantive without any article. "Man was made for society, and ought to extend his good will to all men: but a man will naturally entertain a more particular kindness for the men, with whom he has the most frequent intercourse; and enter into a still closer union with the man whose temper and disposition suit best with his own."

As the articles are sometimes misapplied, it may be of some use to exhibit a few instances: "And I persecuted this way unto the death." The apostle does not mean any particular sort of death, but death in general: the definite article therefore is improperly used: it ought to be" unto death," without any article.

"When he, the Spirit of Truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth;" that is, according to this translation, "into all truth whatsoever, into truth of all kinds;" very different from the meaning of the evangelist, and from the original," into all the truth;" that is, "into all evangelical truth, all truth necessary for you to know."

"Who breaks a butterfly upon a wheel?" it ought to be "the wheel," used as an instrument for the particular purpose of torturing criminals. "The Almighty hath given reason to a man to be a light unto him :" it should rather be, "to man,” in general. "This day is salvation come to this house, forasmuch as he also is the son of Abraham :" it ought to be, " a son of Abraham.”

These remarks may serve to show the great importance of the proper use of the article, and the excellence of the English language in this respect; which, by means of its two articles, does most precisely determine the extent of signification of common names.

1. A nice distinction of the sense is sometimes made

by the use or omission of the article a. If I say; "He behaved with a little reverence;" my meaning is positive. If I say, "He behaved with little reverence;" my meaning is negative. And these two are by no means the same, or to be used in the same cases. By the former, I rather praise a person; by the latter, I dispraise him. For the sake of this distinction, which is a very useful one, we may better bear the seeming impropriety of the article a before nouns of number. When I say, "There were few men with him;" I speak diminutively, and mean to represent them as inconsiderable: whereas, when I say, "There were a few men with him;" I evidently intend to make the most of them.

2. In general, it may be sufficient to prefix the article to the former of two words in the same construction; though the French never fail to repeat it in this case. "There were many hours, both of the night and day, which he could spend, without suspicion, in solitary thought." It might have been "of the night and of the day." And, for the sake of emphasis, we often repeat the article in a series of epithets." He hoped that this title would secure him an ample and an independent authority."

3. In common conversation, and in familiar style, we frequently omit the articles, which might be inserted with propriety in writing, especially in a grave style. "At worst, time might be gained by this expedient." "At the worst," would have been better in this place. "Give me here John Baptist's head." There would have been more dignity in saying, " John the Baptist's head:" or, "The head of John the Baptist."

The article the has sometimes a good effect in distinguishing a person by an epithet. "In the history of Henry the fourth, by Father Daniel, we are surprised at not finding him the great man.” "I own I am often surprised that he should have treated so coldly, a man so much the gentleman."

This article is often elegantly put, after the manner of the French, for the pronoun possessive: as, "He looks him full in the face;" that is, "in his face." "In his presence they were to strike the forehead on the ground;" that is, "their foreheads."

We sometimes, according to the French manner, repeat the same article, when the adjective, on account of any clause depending upon it, is put after the substàntive. "Of all the considerable governments among the Alps, a commonwealth is a constitution the most adapted of any to the poverty of those countries." "With such a specious title as that of blood, which with the multitude is always a claim, the strongest, and the most easily comprehended." They are not the men in the nation the most difficult to be replaced."

RULE X.

One fubftantive governs another, fignifying a different thing, in the poffeffive or genitive case: as, "My father's houfe;" "Man's happinefs;" "Virtue's reward."

When the annexed substantive signifies the same thing as the first, there is no variation of case: as, "George, king of Great Britain, elector of Hanover," &c.; "Pompey contended with Cæsar, the greatest general of his time;" "Religion, the support of adversity, adorns prosperity." Nouns thus circumstanced are said to be in apposition to each other. The interposition of a relative and verb will sometimes break the construction: as, Pompey contended with Cæsar, who was the greatest general of his time." Here the word general is in the nominative case, governed by note 4, under Rule xi.

The preposition of joined to a substantive, is not always equivalent to the possessive case. It is only so, when the expression can be converted into the regular form of the possessive case. We can say, "The reward of virtue," and "Virtue's reward:" but though it is proper to say, "A crown of gold," we cannot convert the expression into the possessive case, and say, "Gold's

crown."

P