Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 1; Volume 7, Part 1American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1988 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 233
... range of 1 % , delivered a resolution of approximately 10 % . For the range of low stresses applied , the spring load factor , SF , was taken to be constant . At the end of each test , the vane rod is detached from the vane , the mirror ...
... range of 1 % , delivered a resolution of approximately 10 % . For the range of low stresses applied , the spring load factor , SF , was taken to be constant . At the end of each test , the vane rod is detached from the vane , the mirror ...
Page 261
... range should be used . = For the practical range of values considered , C. does not have a significant influence on the T and T2 periods . C1 / C2 = 0.1 seems to be a good compromise point . For detailed analysis , a value of about C2 ...
... range should be used . = For the practical range of values considered , C. does not have a significant influence on the T and T2 periods . C1 / C2 = 0.1 seems to be a good compromise point . For detailed analysis , a value of about C2 ...
Page 464
... range versus the draft of the vessel may be calculated for a wide range of charge weights , see Fig . 3 for example . The safe range R is plotted against the draft D for different explosive weights . Of course other failure criteria can ...
... range versus the draft of the vessel may be calculated for a wide range of charge weights , see Fig . 3 for example . The safe range R is plotted against the draft D for different explosive weights . Of course other failure criteria can ...
Contents
FLOATING PRODUCTION SYSTEMS | 1 |
OFFSHORE MECHANICS | 23 |
Early Production Systems in the North | 31 |
Copyright | |
35 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
analysis anchor applied bending calculations components Conference connected considerable considered construction cost curve damage depth determined direction displacement distribution drilling dynamic effect element energy Engineering equation equipment excitation fatigue field Figure fixed flexible floating flow forces frequency function geometry included increase inspection installation International joint length limit linear load lower mass matrix maximum mean measured Mechanics method mode model tests mooring mooring system motion obtained Offshore operating parameters performance period phase pile pipe pipeline platform position presented pressure production ratio response riser RPIT shear shown shows significant soil static stiffness strength stress structure surface Table technique Technology tension tool tower turbine vessel wave weight