## Finite element approximation for optimal shape design: theory and applications |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 84

Page 110

Let £* be a function, defined on dQp U T(a) as

now bossible to construct a non-negative prolongation V>j G H1(Q(a)), fp2 G H1^

) of C from dQ(a), dftt into Q(a) and ft£, respectively. As t/jj = t/>2 on T(a), a

function ...

Let £* be a function, defined on dQp U T(a) as

**follows**£*=0 ondtip, onf(<*). It isnow bossible to construct a non-negative prolongation V>j G H1(Q(a)), fp2 G H1^

) of C from dQ(a), dftt into Q(a) and ft£, respectively. As t/jj = t/>2 on T(a), a

function ...

Page 135

7.13) \\e(v)\\ln > C\\v\\ln Vv G V . 7.2. Variational formulation of contact problems

Let us suppose that a part of the elastic body is close to a rigid foundation.

**follows**from Korn's inequality (see Theorem 1.8): there exists C > 0 such that (7.13) \\e(v)\\ln > C\\v\\ln Vv G V . 7.2. Variational formulation of contact problems

Let us suppose that a part of the elastic body is close to a rigid foundation.

Page 206

As at the same time u > a.e. in Clo, we conclude that u = <p a.e. in fio- As > V a-e-

m it

measfi(a) for any a £ U&d □ Letting k - » oo, we obtain the assertion of Theorem

9.4.

As at the same time u > a.e. in Clo, we conclude that u = <p a.e. in fio- As > V a-e-

m it

**follows**from (9.21) that meas fi(aj*) < meas fi(a^* ) H / (u(ajk ) - ¥>) dx <measfi(a) for any a £ U&d □ Letting k - » oo, we obtain the assertion of Theorem

9.4.

### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

Preliminaries | 1 |

Abstract setting of optimal shape design problem and | 28 |

Optimal shape design of systems governed by a unilateral | 53 |

Copyright | |

10 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

adjoint algorithm Appendix applied approximation boundary conditions boundary value problem Chapter constraints contact problems convergence convex set cost functional defined denote design sensitivity analysis differentiable discrete domain elastic exist a subsequence fi(a Figure finite element fixed follows formula ft(a G K(a G R2 G U&d G V(a given gradient Green's formula Haslinger Haug Hilbert space Hlavacek initial iterations Komkov Lagrange multipliers least one solution Lemma liminf limsup linear Lipschitz Lipschitz continuous lower semicontinuous mapping material derivative method minimize Moreover Necas Neittaanmaki nodal nodes nonlinear programming nonsmooth Numerical results obtain optimal control optimal pair optimal shape design parameter Pironneau Proof prove respect results for Example satisfying sequence sequential quadratic programming shape design problems shape optimization Sokolowski solves P(a stresses subgradient sufficiently small Tc(a Theorem triangulation variational inequality vector Zolesio