Finite Element Approximation for Optimal Shape Design: Theory and ApplicationsExplains how to speed the optimal shape design process using a computer. Outlines the problems inherent in optimal shape design and discusses methods of their solution. Concentrates on finite element approximation and describes numerical realization of optimization techniques. Treats optimal design problems via the optimal control theory when the state systems are governed by variational inequalities. Provides useful background information, followed by numerous approaches to optimal shape design, all supported by illustrative examples. Appendices provide algorithms and numerous examples and their calculations are included. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 45
Page 67
... prove ( Theorem 4.1 ) the existence of a solution a * to ( P ) . Due to the equivalence of ( Ph ) and ( P ) the existence of a solution a to ( Ph ) follows . Moreover , we shall give in Theorem 4.2 an answer to the question : What is ...
... prove ( Theorem 4.1 ) the existence of a solution a * to ( P ) . Due to the equivalence of ( Ph ) and ( P ) the existence of a solution a to ( Ph ) follows . Moreover , we shall give in Theorem 4.2 an answer to the question : What is ...
Page 68
... proved in several stages . We shall verify the assumptions A ( k ) -A ( kkk ) of Theorem 2.3 . First of all , from Begis and Glowinski ( 1975 ) it follows that any a € Vad can be approximated by an Є Uha aha in ... prove that xn ( a ) = u 68.
... proved in several stages . We shall verify the assumptions A ( k ) -A ( kkk ) of Theorem 2.3 . First of all , from Begis and Glowinski ( 1975 ) it follows that any a € Vad can be approximated by an Є Uha aha in ... prove that xn ( a ) = u 68.
Page 202
... proved . vjolsnjo As ana jo and violanje = 0. Hence Remark 9.2 . Sequence { v ; } , satisfying ( i ) , ( ii ) can be ... prove that ũ│n ( a ) Є K ( N ( a ) ) , i.e. ũ│n ( a ) E H¦ ( N ( a ) ) and ũ│n ( a ) ≥ v│n ( a ) a.e. in N ( a ) ...
... proved . vjolsnjo As ana jo and violanje = 0. Hence Remark 9.2 . Sequence { v ; } , satisfying ( i ) , ( ii ) can be ... prove that ũ│n ( a ) Є K ( N ( a ) ) , i.e. ũ│n ( a ) E H¦ ( N ( a ) ) and ũ│n ( a ) ≥ v│n ( a ) a.e. in N ( a ) ...
Contents
Preliminaries | 1 |
Abstract setting of optimal shape design problem and | 28 |
Optimal shape design of systems governed by a unilateral | 53 |
Copyright | |
11 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
algorithm Appendix applied approximation boundary value problem C₁ Céa Computer constraints contact problems convex convex set cost functional defined denote design sensitivity analysis differentiable discrete domain elastic element method exist a subsequence Figure Find finite element finite element method follows formula given Glowinski Gm(a H¹(Î Haslinger Haug Hlaváček Ir(an ITERATION jEJk ji Eli Komkov Lagrange multipliers Lemma lim inf lim sup linear Lipschitz continuous lower semicontinuous matrix minimization Nečas Neittaanmäki nodes nonlinear programming nonsmooth Numerical results obtain optimal control optimal design optimal pair optimal shape design parameter Pironneau Proof results for Example Section sequence shape design problems Shape optimization Sokolowski solves P(a structural design structural optimization subgradient subset T(Un T₁ Theorem triangulation un(an variational inequality vector w₁ Zolesio г₁