Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1988 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 50
Page xvi
A comparison of lift force coefficients again shows Grace's results to be somewhat lower . The maximum lift phase angle shows considerable scatter . The maximum lift most frequently occurs at maximum velocity but can also be seen to ...
A comparison of lift force coefficients again shows Grace's results to be somewhat lower . The maximum lift phase angle shows considerable scatter . The maximum lift most frequently occurs at maximum velocity but can also be seen to ...
Page 9
Therefore , the drag was used , obtained by subtracting the inertia force from the measured horizontal force , 1 ) Drag , inertia and lift coefficients ( CD ) CM CL ? 2 ) Fourier coefficients and associated phase angles ( Chn ' ® Hn ...
Therefore , the drag was used , obtained by subtracting the inertia force from the measured horizontal force , 1 ) Drag , inertia and lift coefficients ( CD ) CM CL ? 2 ) Fourier coefficients and associated phase angles ( Chn ' ® Hn ...
Page 44
As for profile V , the negative lift can be explained by the position of the stagnation point and the angle of attack of the approaching flow . This angle can in Fig . 6 be found to be around 10-15 degrees , which fits well with the ...
As for profile V , the negative lift can be explained by the position of the stagnation point and the angle of attack of the approaching flow . This angle can in Fig . 6 be found to be around 10-15 degrees , which fits well with the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Seabed Scour Under Pipelines | 33 |
Flow Around and Forces on a Pipeline Near a Scoured | 39 |
MEASUREMENTS OF PIPELINE LEAK DETECTION | 55 |
Copyright | |
26 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
analysis application approach Arctic areas assumed axial bending bottom boundary buckling calculated carried caused coefficient combined compared compression considered corrosion cost cylinder deformation depth detection determined developed diameter direction displacement drag effect element Engineering equation example experimental experiments field Figure flow force frequency function given ground heat increase installation International leak length lift lift force limit liquid load material maximum mean measured Mechanics metal method monitoring movement normal obtained offshore operating parameters performed period phase pipe pipeline position predicted present pressure problem procedure properties range ratio regular waves relatively response scour seabed shown shows simulated soil solution span steel strain stress structural surface Table technique temperature thickness tion values variation velocity wall wave welding zone
Bibliographic information
| Title | Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5 |
| Contributor | American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Division |
| Publisher | American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1988 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |