Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 46Connecticut Bar Association, 1972 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 73
Page 165
... taxpayers.99 In view of these facts , it is pure sophistry to insist that a tax on intangibles will hurt low - income taxpayers . It is , of course , possible to grant exemptions to those in the lower income category . However , there ...
... taxpayers.99 In view of these facts , it is pure sophistry to insist that a tax on intangibles will hurt low - income taxpayers . It is , of course , possible to grant exemptions to those in the lower income category . However , there ...
Page 200
... taxpayers had every reason to believe that there was no tax on any of their dividends and that their capital gains were taxed at 50 % ( under the 1969 Act ) . Thereafter , the general income tax , effective July 1 , 1971 , put taxpayers ...
... taxpayers had every reason to believe that there was no tax on any of their dividends and that their capital gains were taxed at 50 % ( under the 1969 Act ) . Thereafter , the general income tax , effective July 1 , 1971 , put taxpayers ...
Page 222
... taxpayers ) . Thus , the head of the household will pay all or most of the Connecticut tax and receive a deduc- tion for it in his higher federal tax bracket the following year . The formula's fraction may exceed 100 % because there is ...
... taxpayers ) . Thus , the head of the household will pay all or most of the Connecticut tax and receive a deduc- tion for it in his higher federal tax bracket the following year . The formula's fraction may exceed 100 % because there is ...
Contents
LEADING ARTICLES | 6 |
Proposal for Revision of the Connecticut Statutes Relative | 8 |
Chronic Alcoholism | 12 |
Copyright | |
42 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative Administrative Procedure Act agreement amended amount application assessment attorney authorized bank Berall bill capital gains tax cardholder Charge Card charitable choses in action Commission Committee Report companies comparative negligence Conn Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Supreme Court corporation decision deduction dividends and capital divorce Edward G effect electricity enacted Environmental exemption federal income tax fees Fiduciary Powers Act filing Hartford Hartford County imposed income tax law intangible property interest Internal Revenue Code investment income tax issuer-bank judge judicial June jury legislative legislature liability Mascolo ment merchant negligence nonrecognition partnership payment person plaintiff prior private foundation Probate Court problem Procedure property tax question real estate regulations rules sales drafts sales tax Section Sess Session STAT statute succession tax supra note Supreme Court tax base Tax Commissioner Tax Reform tax return taxable taxation taxpayers testimony tion trust verdict