What will happen when a machine takes the part of A in this game? Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like this as he does when the game is played between a man and a woman?" These questions replace our original, "Can... Understanding Intelligence - Page 17by Rolf Pfeifer, Christian Scheier - 2001 - 700 pagesLimited preview - About this book
| Felicia Miller-Frank - Literary Criticism - 1995 - 252 pages
...(B) is to help the interrogator. The best strategy ... is probably to give truthful answers. . . . We now ask the question, "What will happen when a...game?" Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often as when the game is played between a man and a woman? These questions replace our original "Can machines... | |
| John Anzalone - Law - 1996 - 216 pages
...player (B) is to help the interrogator. The best strategy...is probably to give truthful answers ... We now ask the question, "What will happen when a...game?" Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often as when the game is played between a man and a woman? These questions replace our original "Can machines... | |
| Charles O. Hartman - Literary Criticism - 1996 - 170 pages
...categories like gender as absolute. Against this, Turing poses his question in terms of probability: "Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like this [between human and machine] as he [sic] does when the game is played between a man and a woman?" And... | |
| Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick - Literary Criticism - 1997 - 532 pages
...(433). Turing concludes his description of what has subsequently been known as "The Turing test" with the question, " 'What will happen when a machine takes the part of A [the man] in this game?' Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like... | |
| Reinhard Zecher - Cultural pluralism - 1999 - 372 pages
...steckt indirekt die Frage dahinter, ob Maschinen denkfähig sind. „We now ask the question.'What will happen when a machine takes the part of A in this game?' Will the interrogator decide wrongly äs often when the game is played like this äs he does when the game is played between a man and a... | |
| David B. Fogel - Computers - 2002 - 430 pages
...writings on the methods involved in the test were contradictory. He first wrote, as I noted in the text, "We now ask the question, 'What will happen when a machine takes the part of [the man] in this game?' Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like... | |
| James Moor - Computers - 2003 - 294 pages
...would have endorsed the result of precising the 1952 prediction in the way proposed in the 1950 paper: We now ask the question. "What will happen when a machine takes the part of A in this [man-imitates-woman] game?" Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like... | |
| B. Jack. Copeland - Science - 2004 - 622 pages
...Computer Simulation of Paranoia from the Real Thing?', Journal of Psychiatric Research, 15 (1980), 149-62. We now ask the question, 'What will happen when a machine takes the part of A in this [man-imitates-woman] game?' Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like... | |
| Jay Friedenberg, Gordon Silverman - Education - 2006 - 562 pages
...the man, is attempting to mislead the interrogator.] Turing takes this a step further when he asks the question: "What will happen when a machine takes the part of A (the man) in this game?" The passionate debate that sprang up in the wake of Turing's paper has led... | |
| Robert Kolker - Performing Arts - 2006 - 216 pages
...of the game is to determine which of the other two is the man and which is the woman. . . . We may now ask the question, "What will happen when a machine takes the part of A in the game?" Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like this as he does... | |
| |