From Energy Dreams to Nuclear Nightmares: Lessons from the Anti-nuclear Power Movement in the 1970sThis book challenges the existing histories and explanations for the growth of the anti-nuclear power movement in the United Kingdom from 1955 to 1979. Arguing that opposition to nuclear power emerged in the 1970s because of the concerns of a minority of people about the dangers of atomic energy, based on the ecological messages contained in bestselling science fiction novels from the late 1940s to mid 1960s. Showing how a minority of the 1960s underground press blended old conservation ideas with counterculture styles to create new radical groups such as Friends of the Earth, this analysis also seeks to answer questions such as Why an anti-nuclear power movement instead of an anti-coal or anti-asbestos movement? What was it about nuclear power that generated such opposition—its environmental impact, its cost, its prospects or its symbolism? and Could wind power in the 21st century face the same forces that opposed nuclear power 30 years ago? |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 40
Page 127
They distinguish between the role of movement and establishment intellectuals in
the formation of social movements , with ... The environmental movement
emerged in large measure from the activity of established intellectuals , thus
seemingly ...
They distinguish between the role of movement and establishment intellectuals in
the formation of social movements , with ... The environmental movement
emerged in large measure from the activity of established intellectuals , thus
seemingly ...
Page 147
Its behaviour only reinforced people ' s suspicions about it being a powerful and
arrogant bureaucracy or what was called an ' atomic establishment . Even the
industry trade journal , Nucleonics Week , noted that the hearings ' have opened
up ...
Its behaviour only reinforced people ' s suspicions about it being a powerful and
arrogant bureaucracy or what was called an ' atomic establishment . Even the
industry trade journal , Nucleonics Week , noted that the hearings ' have opened
up ...
Page 206
The 1970s campaign had far less political support and access . But it had more
media coverage and some public support . It had style but no power . It
influenced public opinion somewhat but failed to attract established
organizations , such as ...
The 1970s campaign had far less political support and access . But it had more
media coverage and some public support . It had style but no power . It
influenced public opinion somewhat but failed to attract established
organizations , such as ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Introduction | 1 |
The saga of reprocessing | 10 |
Twentieth century nuclear visions | 13 |
Copyright | |
22 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
action active activists alternative anti-nuclear Appeal areas argued arguments Association atomic energy became become believed BNFL bomb Britain British building called campaign civil coal commented concerns Conservation ConSoc Council critics culture dangers debate decision direct early Earth ecological economic electricity environment environmental establishment evidence existing favour fear FoE's future groups human ideas important industry influence inquiry intellectuals interest involved issues John late later living London magazine March movement nature novel nuclear power nuclear power stations opposed opposition organizations Peace perhaps planning political problems programme proposed protest public inquiry published question radiation radical radioactive reactor remarked reprocessing rural safety saying scientists seen social society solar technical tion Undercurrents underground utopian views vision waste wide Windscale writers wrote