Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 247
When we consider the two major sources of error that beset noncohesive groups
- deliberate conformity out of fear of recrimination and a win - lose fighting stance
- we see that cohesive groups can have great advantages if groupthink ...
When we consider the two major sources of error that beset noncohesive groups
- deliberate conformity out of fear of recrimination and a win - lose fighting stance
- we see that cohesive groups can have great advantages if groupthink ...
Page 248
But even when the basis of high cohesiveness is enhancement of task - oriented
values in a well - functioning group whose ... A cohesive group that on one
occasion suffers from groupthink is capable on other occasions of gaining the ...
But even when the basis of high cohesiveness is enhancement of task - oriented
values in a well - functioning group whose ... A cohesive group that on one
occasion suffers from groupthink is capable on other occasions of gaining the ...
Page 249
... conforming : ( 1 ) the cohesive decisionmaking group is insulated from the
judgments of qualified associates within the ... ( 2 ) from the outset of the cohesive
group ' s deliberations , the leader does not feel constrained by any
organizational ...
... conforming : ( 1 ) the cohesive decisionmaking group is insulated from the
judgments of qualified associates within the ... ( 2 ) from the outset of the cohesive
group ' s deliberations , the leader does not feel constrained by any
organizational ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Why So Many Miscalculations? | 2 |
The Wrong | 48 |
Or Why the Fortress Slept | 72 |
Copyright | |
6 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept according action administration Admiral advisers alternative American appears asked assumptions attack avoid Bay of Pigs become called Chiefs cohesive Committee concerning consensus consequences continued course cover-up crisis critical Cuba Cuban danger Dean decision decision-making Defense deliberations Department direct discussion effect errors evidence example Executive expected fact feel fiasco forces give groupthink Haldeman initial invasion issues Japanese Johnson judgment Kennedy leader leading major March meetings military missile moral Nixon norms North objections officers operation participants Pearl Harbor policy-making policy-making group political position possible present President pressures probably problem procedures proposed questions responsible result risks role says Secretary seems Senator shared social Soviet staff stress strong suggested thinking threat tion transcripts Truman United Vietnam warning Watergate White House