Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 72
Page
The second section , for comparative purposes , presents two case studies of well
worked out decisions made by similar groups whose members made realistic
appraisals of the consequences . One of these is the course of action chosen by ...
The second section , for comparative purposes , presents two case studies of well
worked out decisions made by similar groups whose members made realistic
appraisals of the consequences . One of these is the course of action chosen by ...
Page 136
The decision - makers ( 1 ) thoroughly canvassed a wide range of alternative
courses of action ; ( 2 ) surveyed the objectives and the values implicated ; ( 3 )
carefully weighed the costs , drawbacks , and subtle risks of negative
consequences ...
The decision - makers ( 1 ) thoroughly canvassed a wide range of alternative
courses of action ; ( 2 ) surveyed the objectives and the values implicated ; ( 3 )
carefully weighed the costs , drawbacks , and subtle risks of negative
consequences ...
Page 145
The decision - makers ( 1 ) thoroughly canvassed a wide range of alternative
courses of action ; ( 2 ) surveyed the objectives and the values implicated ; ( 3 )
carefully weighed the costs , drawbacks , and subtle risks of negative
consequences ...
The decision - makers ( 1 ) thoroughly canvassed a wide range of alternative
courses of action ; ( 2 ) surveyed the objectives and the values implicated ; ( 3 )
carefully weighed the costs , drawbacks , and subtle risks of negative
consequences ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Why So Many Miscalculations? | 2 |
The Wrong | 48 |
Or Why the Fortress Slept | 72 |
Copyright | |
6 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept according action administration Admiral advisers alternative American appears asked assumptions attack avoid Bay of Pigs become called Chiefs cohesive Committee concerning consensus consequences continued course cover-up crisis critical Cuba Cuban danger Dean decision decision-making Defense deliberations Department direct discussion effect errors evidence example Executive expected fact feel fiasco forces give groupthink Haldeman initial invasion issues Japanese Johnson judgment Kennedy leader leading major March meetings military missile moral Nixon norms North objections officers operation participants Pearl Harbor policy-making policy-making group political position possible present President pressures probably problem procedures proposed questions responsible result risks role says Secretary seems Senator shared social Soviet staff stress strong suggested thinking threat tion transcripts Truman United Vietnam warning Watergate White House