Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 120
For example , at a meeting on December 18 , 1965 , when McNamara , Rusk ,
and Bundy argued for a bombing pause in order to pursue Soviet Ambassador
Dobrynin ' s proposal for diplomatic discussions with Hanoi , the military men and
...
For example , at a meeting on December 18 , 1965 , when McNamara , Rusk ,
and Bundy argued for a bombing pause in order to pursue Soviet Ambassador
Dobrynin ' s proposal for diplomatic discussions with Hanoi , the military men and
...
Page 187
For example , in 1914 the French military high command ignored repeated
warnings that Germany had adopted the Schlieffen Plan , which called for a rapid
assault through Belgium and then southward to Paris in order to outflank France '
s ...
For example , in 1914 the French military high command ignored repeated
warnings that Germany had adopted the Schlieffen Plan , which called for a rapid
assault through Belgium and then southward to Paris in order to outflank France '
s ...
Page 301
Here I am referring to such examples as Admiral Kimmel ' s complacent group of
naval commanders at Pearl Harbor when ... For example , there is an asymmetry
in the formulations of the two sources of stress ( items 1 and 2 in box B - 2 in ...
Here I am referring to such examples as Admiral Kimmel ' s complacent group of
naval commanders at Pearl Harbor when ... For example , there is an asymmetry
in the formulations of the two sources of stress ( items 1 and 2 in box B - 2 in ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Why So Many Miscalculations? | 2 |
The Wrong | 48 |
Or Why the Fortress Slept | 72 |
Copyright | |
6 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept according action administration Admiral advisers alternative American appears asked assumptions attack avoid Bay of Pigs become called Chiefs cohesive Committee concerning consensus consequences continued course cover-up crisis critical Cuba Cuban danger Dean decision decision-making Defense deliberations Department direct discussion effect errors evidence example Executive expected fact feel fiasco forces give groupthink Haldeman initial invasion issues Japanese Johnson judgment Kennedy leader leading major March meetings military missile moral Nixon norms North objections officers operation participants Pearl Harbor policy-making policy-making group political position possible present President pressures probably problem procedures proposed questions responsible result risks role says Secretary seems Senator shared social Soviet staff stress strong suggested thinking threat tion transcripts Truman United Vietnam warning Watergate White House