Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 49
Page 108
... groupthink hypothesis . Applying the groupthink hypothesis Because we still lack well - authenticated details of the way the President and his inner circle carried out their policy deliberations from 1964 to 1968 , the available ...
... groupthink hypothesis . Applying the groupthink hypothesis Because we still lack well - authenticated details of the way the President and his inner circle carried out their policy deliberations from 1964 to 1968 , the available ...
Page 117
... group pressures , we shall have some strong support for the groupthink hypothesis . These are not rhetorical questions . Several alternative hypotheses could account for the departure of the domesticated dissenters . The groupthink hy ...
... group pressures , we shall have some strong support for the groupthink hypothesis . These are not rhetorical questions . Several alternative hypotheses could account for the departure of the domesticated dissenters . The groupthink hy ...
Page 191
... groupthink hypothesis does not necessarily contradict this type of ex- planation . But instead of placing all the blame on the policy - makers ' personal deficiencies , the groupthink hypothesis adds that these defects are augmented ...
... groupthink hypothesis does not necessarily contradict this type of ex- planation . But instead of placing all the blame on the policy - makers ' personal deficiencies , the groupthink hypothesis adds that these defects are augmented ...
Contents
Why So Many Miscalculations? | 2 |
The Bay of Pigs | 14 |
The Wrong | 48 |
Copyright | |
7 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept according action administration Admiral advisers alternative American appears asked assumptions attack avoid Bay of Pigs become called Chiefs cohesive Committee concerning consensus consequences continued course cover-up crisis critical Cuba Cuban danger Dean decision decision-making Defense deliberations Department direct discussion effect errors evidence example Executive expected fact feel fiasco forces give groupthink Haldeman initial invasion issues Japanese Johnson judgment Kennedy leader leading major March meetings military missile moral Nixon norms North objections officers operation participants Pearl Harbor policy-making policy-making group political position possible present President pressures probably problem procedures proposed questions responsible result risks role says Secretary seems Senator shared social Soviet staff stress strong suggested thinking threat tion transcripts Truman United Vietnam warning Watergate White House