Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 105
Yet precisely during the months when the election victory was still fresh in mind
President Johnson and his advisers made the major decisions to authorize the
Rolling Thunder program . Tom Wicker , New York Times associate editor and ...
Yet precisely during the months when the election victory was still fresh in mind
President Johnson and his advisers made the major decisions to authorize the
Rolling Thunder program . Tom Wicker , New York Times associate editor and ...
Page 106
A major part of Ellsberg ' s argument about the lack of a sizable gap between
expectations and reality hinges on the fact that when the major escalation
decisions were made , reports from intelligence experts in the CIA , the State
Department ...
A major part of Ellsberg ' s argument about the lack of a sizable gap between
expectations and reality hinges on the fact that when the major escalation
decisions were made , reports from intelligence experts in the CIA , the State
Department ...
Page 107
The evidence shows that even if his main arguments against the quagmire myth
are subsequently verified by fresh evidence about the deliberations of the policy -
makers , his analysis of the major escalation decisions made by the Johnson ...
The evidence shows that even if his main arguments against the quagmire myth
are subsequently verified by fresh evidence about the deliberations of the policy -
makers , his analysis of the major escalation decisions made by the Johnson ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Why So Many Miscalculations? | 2 |
The Wrong | 48 |
Or Why the Fortress Slept | 72 |
Copyright | |
6 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept according action administration Admiral advisers alternative American appears asked assumptions attack avoid Bay of Pigs become called Chiefs cohesive Committee concerning consensus consequences continued course cover-up crisis critical Cuba Cuban danger Dean decision decision-making Defense deliberations Department direct discussion effect errors evidence example Executive expected fact feel fiasco forces give groupthink Haldeman initial invasion issues Japanese Johnson judgment Kennedy leader leading major March meetings military missile moral Nixon norms North objections officers operation participants Pearl Harbor policy-making policy-making group political position possible present President pressures probably problem procedures proposed questions responsible result risks role says Secretary seems Senator shared social Soviet staff stress strong suggested thinking threat tion transcripts Truman United Vietnam warning Watergate White House