Julius Caesar: Man, Soldier, and Tyrant
Since the Renaissance, Julius Caesar has been idolized as a superman. Classical sources, however, present a far less exalted being. As General Fuller writes, Caesar was "an unscrupulous demagogue whose one aim was power, and a general who could not only win brilliant victories but also commit dismal blunders.... It is reasonable to suspect that, at times, Caesar was not responsible for his actions, and toward the end of his life, not altogether sane." There is not doubt that Caesar was an extraordinary man.” But Fuller points out that he was extraordinary for his reckless ambition, matchless daring, and ruthless tyranny, rather than for his skills as a military comander. Caesar continually had to extricate himself from results of mistakes of judgement. His unnecessary Alexandrian War, his close call at Thapsus, and his seemingly unpremeditated Gallic conquest are just a few of Fuller's many examples.And in telling Caesar's history, Fuller illuminates a century of Roman history as well. Aided by maps of Caesar's principal battles and diagrams of many of his weapons, Fuller brings to life Caesar's wars, his armies, his equipment, and his methods. Brilliant in design and impressive in scope, Julius Caesar clarifies how the military, political, and economic aspects of the Roman Republic worked together to produce a man whose name has come down to us as a synonym for absolute authority.
Results 1-3 of 61
instead they monopolized the kingly power - his imperium - and vested it in two of
their fellows, first known as praetors (leaders) and later as consuls, who were
elected yearly by the Assembly of the People. Like the kings, they were endowed
Like the consuls, the persons of the tribunes were sacrosanct during their yearly
term of office, and like them each tribune had power to initiate laws and to veto
not only consular proposals but also those of his colleagues. In brief, two sets of ...
Further, the tribunes were forbidden to convene meetings of the people, and
although their right of veto was not abolished, presumably because the Senate
might find it convenient in order to check an obstructive consul, it was restricted.
What people are saying - Write a review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - Schmerguls - LibraryThing
999 Julius Caesar: Man, Soldier, and Tyrant, by Major-General J. F. C. Fuller (read 23 Feb 1969) After I read this book and Natthias Gelzer's book on Caesar I said: It is amazing to me how little I ... Read full review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - jerry-book - LibraryThing
Good review of Caesar. But a lot is just copied from Caesar, not much in the way of insight. Read full review