Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 55Connecticut Bar Association, 1981 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 91
Page 201
2 ; if the answer to the question is no , go no further and return a general verdict in favor of the defendant William Jones . ) [ In the alternative to question 1 , when it is desirable to have the jury define in more detail these ...
2 ; if the answer to the question is no , go no further and return a general verdict in favor of the defendant William Jones . ) [ In the alternative to question 1 , when it is desirable to have the jury define in more detail these ...
Page 202
the negligence is attributable to the plaintiff John Smith , the remainder of the questions are not to be answered ... Question 5 : Without prorating the award of damages , what sum of money would fairly , justly and reasonably ...
the negligence is attributable to the plaintiff John Smith , the remainder of the questions are not to be answered ... Question 5 : Without prorating the award of damages , what sum of money would fairly , justly and reasonably ...
Page 203
Question 3 : Did the plaintiff Rapid Wheels prove that as a result of such defective condition , the tanker - trailer was unreasonably dangerous to the user ? Answer : Question 4 : Did the plaintiff Rapid Wheels prove that the said ...
Question 3 : Did the plaintiff Rapid Wheels prove that as a result of such defective condition , the tanker - trailer was unreasonably dangerous to the user ? Answer : Question 4 : Did the plaintiff Rapid Wheels prove that the said ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Connecticut Supreme Court Review 197980 Court Year Wesley W Horton | 1 |
Survey of 1980 Developments in Connecticut mily | 29 |
Corporations William H Cuddy | 62 |
34 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
41 Conn action administrative amendment answer appeal apply arrest assistance Association authority basis benefit Board cause charge civil claim client Code concerning conclusion Connecticut considered constitutional continue corporation counsel course crime criminal damages decision defendant determine discussion duty effect employee equal ERISA evidence exemption existing fact federal filed firms funds held holding included increase institutions instructions interest interrogatories issue judges judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice lawyers lesser limited matter ment obligation offense offering organization parties person plaintiff practice present prior problems profession programs question reach reasonable received regulations reporting result rule securities STAT statement statute substantial supra Supreme Court termination tion Title tort trial court United verdict violation