On the Psychology of Military IncompetenceThe Crimea, the Boer War, the Somme, Tobruk, Pearl Harbor, the Bay of Pigs: these are just some of the milestones in a century of military incompetence, of costly mishaps and tragic blunders. Are these simple accidents--as the "bloody fool” theory has it--or are they inevitable? The psychologist Norman F. Dixon argues that there is a pattern to inept generalship, and locates this pattern within the very act of creating armies in the first place, which in his view produces a levelling down of human capability that encourages the mediocre and limits the gifted. In this light, successful generals achieve what they do despite the stultifying features of the organization to which they belong. A classic study of military leadership, On the Psychology of Military Incompetence is at once an original exploration of the battles that have defined the last two centuries of human civilization and an essential guide for the next generation of military leaders. |
Contents
Introduction | 1 |
PART ONE | 11 |
Authors Note | 12 |
Generalship | 13 |
The Crimean War | 23 |
The Boer War | 41 |
Indian Interlude | 60 |
The First World War | 74 |
Character and Honour | 208 |
AntiEffeminacy | 223 |
Leaders of Men | 231 |
Military Achievement | 258 |
Authoritarianism | 279 |
Mothers of Incompetence | 307 |
Education and the Cult ofMuscular Christianity | 317 |
PART THREE | 333 |
Cambrai | 81 |
The Siege of Kut | 92 |
Between the Wars | 109 |
The Second World War | 124 |
Singapore | 132 |
Arnhem | 149 |
PART TWO | 155 |
Is There a Case to Answer? | 157 |
The Intellectual Ability ofSenior Military Commanders | 163 |
Military Organizations | 177 |
Bullshit | 185 |
Socialization and the Anal Character | 200 |
Individual Differences | 335 |
Extremes of Authoritarianism | 339 |
The Worst and the Best | 350 |
Exceptions to the Rule? | 392 |
Retreat | 437 |
Afterword | 451 |
Notes | 453 |
469 | |
483 | |
About the Author | 497 |
back cover | 503 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
According achieved achievement-motivation Admiral aggression anxiety aspects attack attitudes authoritarian personality B. H. Liddell Hart Basra battle behaviour Boer British Army bull Buller casualties civilian commander-in-chief competent considered Corps Correlli Barnett Crimean Crimean War criticism decisions defences disaster Donald Macintyre effects Elphinstone enemy evidence fact factors feelings Field-Marshal fighting Firstly force French generalship German guns Haig Haig’s Himmler Hitler honour human Ibid intellectual intelligence Japanese lack leaders leadership less Liddell Hart Lord military commanders military incompetence military organizations mind Montgomery moral nature naval Navy never Noel Barber obedience obsessive officers one’s op.cit perhaps position professional psychological Raglan rank reasons remarkable response result Secondly seems senior commanders sexual siege of Kut Simon Raven Singapore Sir John French social soldiers sort staff suggested superior T. E. Lawrence tanks tend tendency theory tion Townshend traits troops underlying warfare Wellington World