Connecticut Bar Journal, Volumes 18-19State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1944 - Law Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 63
Page 142
... ment is , I believe , the July 1 amendment . Do you wish to discuss that further ? Anything further , in the light of what Mr. Wake said and the President of the State Bar Association has remarked ? Mr. Frank Covella : I would like to ...
... ment is , I believe , the July 1 amendment . Do you wish to discuss that further ? Anything further , in the light of what Mr. Wake said and the President of the State Bar Association has remarked ? Mr. Frank Covella : I would like to ...
Page 150
... ment . That is , to have it separated , —and put in two halves . A Delegate : I second that . Chairman Pettengill : We will assume it will be separated in two sections . I think that is the wish of the Board . The first portion is the ...
... ment . That is , to have it separated , —and put in two halves . A Delegate : I second that . Chairman Pettengill : We will assume it will be separated in two sections . I think that is the wish of the Board . The first portion is the ...
Page 28
... ment ; the better to effect which it is presumable they would tamper beforehand with leading individuals in the adjacent States . If associates could not be found at home , recourse would be had to the aid of foreign powers , who would ...
... ment ; the better to effect which it is presumable they would tamper beforehand with leading individuals in the adjacent States . If associates could not be found at home , recourse would be had to the aid of foreign powers , who would ...
Contents
SUMMARY DRAFT OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMISSION | 41 |
WHY BAR INTEGRATION WAS REJECTED | 54 |
CONCERNING CHANGES IN STATUTE LAW | 81 |
20 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action administration adopted amendment American appeal apply appointed Assembly assistance authority Bar Association bills Board called cause Chairman charged claims commission Committee concerning Congress Connecticut consideration considered Constitution course death decision defendant Delegates direction discussion District effect elected evidence Executive existing fact federal further give given Hartford Haven hearing held important income integration interest issue judges judicial jury justice lawyers legislative limited Main Street matter means meeting ment necessary officers opinion original parties passed period person Pettengill possible practice present President probate problem procedure proceedings proposed provides question reason received recommended record reference representatives resolution result rule Secretary statute suggested Superior Court Supreme Court taken term tion trial trust United vote