..."This "indirect subsidy" effect only evokes Establishment Clause concerns when the public funds flow to "an institution in which religion is so pervasive...its functions are subsumed in the religious mission . . . ." Hunt v. McNair, 413 US, at 743. In this case, the District Court explicitly found that 40...

...aspect of an institution frees it to spend its other resources on religious ends. Aid normally may be thought to have a primary effect of advancing religion...religious activity in an otherwise substantially secular selting. In Tilton v. Richardson, supra, the Court refused to strike down a direct federal grant to...

...provision of labor and equipment to, the Pageant. The court concluded that the Pageant was not the type of institution in which religion is so pervasive that a substantial portion of its functions subsumed in a religious mission. Although the creche was conceded to be a "patently religious symbol,"...

...under the refinement of the test added by Hunt v. McNair, 413 US 734, 743, that aid has such an effect "when it flows to an institution in which religion...activity in an otherwise substantially secular setting." Here the District Court's finding that appellee colleges are not "pervasively sectarian" was supported...

...Board of Public Works of Maryland, 426 US 736, 746 (1976) or" (2) when the tuition is paid to a school "in which religion is so pervasive that a substantial...activity in an otherwise substantially secular setting," Hunt v. McNair, 413 US 734, 743 (1973). See also Meek v. Pittenger, 412 US 439, 366 (1975) ("The very...

...Government aid on secular purposes. Hunt v. McNair first stated the principle: ". . . aid normally may be thought to have a primary effect of advancing religion...substantial portion of its functions are subsumed in its religious mission or when it funds a specifically religious activity in an otherwise substantially...

...do that. Mr. DORSEY. It gets down to the question about pervasively sectarian organizations. If it is so pervasive that a substantial portion of its functions are subsumed in its religious mission, then you cannot separate out the sectarian and the nonsectarian uses. If it...

...a "primary effect" the advancement of religion. A very sizeable percentage of these funds would go to "an institution in which religion is so pervasive...functions are subsumed in the religious mission". Hunt v. McNair 413 US 734, 743 (1973). This view is not contradicted in Justice Rehnquist's recent...

...the aid flowed to "pervasively sectarian" institutions, which it had earlier defined as institutions "in which religion is so pervasive that a substantial portion of its functions are subscribed in the religious mission."32 In such an institution, even aid designated for secular purposes...

...values to their students.12 For example, in Hunt v. McNair, the Court stated that "aid normally may be thought to have a primary effect of advancing religion...portion of its functions are subsumed in the religious mission."13 Thus, financial aid that flows directly to parochial schools advances religion in violation...