The Politics of Indigeneity: Challenging the State in Canada and Aotearoa New ZealandThe period 1995 to 2004 was the UN's International Decade of World Indigenous Peoples. This reflected the increasing organization of indigenous peoples around a commonality of concerns, needs and ambitions. In both New Zealand and Canada, these politics challenge the colonial structures that social and political systems are built upon. Both countries have accomplished much in their management of indigenous issues. New Zealand has begun to right historical wrongs through treaty settlements and to implement bicultural strategies. Canada is experimenting with self-government for aboriginal peoples. Yet there are still many issues to be addressed, with recent statistics showing indigenous peoples in both these countries struggling to balance functioning in everyday life with preserving their cultures. By focusing on the present within the context of the past and future, The Politics of Indigeneity casts light on the constitutional politics in both countries that are redefining the relation |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 80
Page 91
... basis for entitlement - that is , should tribal structures be a component or the source of Māori ethnic identity ; and ( c ) clarifying the role of the Crown in relating to Māori as ethnicity and / or iwi for purposes of entitlement ...
... basis for entitlement - that is , should tribal structures be a component or the source of Māori ethnic identity ; and ( c ) clarifying the role of the Crown in relating to Māori as ethnicity and / or iwi for purposes of entitlement ...
Page 101
... basis for an indigenous Māori autonomy by securing control over resource use and decision making as a precondition for self - determined development ( Cornell and Kalt , 1995 ; Loomis , 2000 ) . Confusion is rife . Tino rangatiratanga ...
... basis for an indigenous Māori autonomy by securing control over resource use and decision making as a precondition for self - determined development ( Cornell and Kalt , 1995 ; Loomis , 2000 ) . Confusion is rife . Tino rangatiratanga ...
Page 262
... basis of race or ethnicity ; what we do as individuals is more important than group membership as a basis for engagement and entitlement ; the content of our actions supersedes the colour of our skins as a judge of character ; people ...
... basis of race or ethnicity ; what we do as individuals is more important than group membership as a basis for engagement and entitlement ; the content of our actions supersedes the colour of our skins as a judge of character ; people ...
Contents
Preface | 7 |
Engaging Indigeneity | 13 |
Challenge Resistance and Transformation | 25 |
Copyright | |
6 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
Aboriginal accepted According acknowledge advancing Affairs agenda agreement assimilation authority basis Canada Canadian central challenge citizenship claims colonial commitment communities concerns constitutional order constructive context continue Court created Crown cultural defined demands determining difference discourse distinct economic effect endorsed engagement entitlement equal established ethnicity existing federal Fleras foundational framework fundamental groups historical identity Indian indigenous rights individual inherent initiatives institutional interests involving issues jurisdiction land language levels living living together differently Māori models Native needs negotiated organisation Pākehā partnership past political practice Press principles problem proposed protect reality recognition references reflect relations relationship remain Report reserves response result rules schools secure self-determining self-determining autonomy self-government settlements settler shared shift social social contract society sovereign sovereignty status structures territorial tino rangatiratanga traditional Treaty tribal tribes University urban Waitangi Zealand
References to this book
Child, Youth and Family Health: Strengthening Communities Margaret Barnes,Jennifer Rowe Limited preview - 2008 |