The Politics of Indigeneity: Challenging the State in Canada and Aotearoa New ZealandThe period 1995 to 2004 was the UN's International Decade of World Indigenous Peoples. This reflected the increasing organization of indigenous peoples around a commonality of concerns, needs and ambitions. In both New Zealand and Canada, these politics challenge the colonial structures that social and political systems are built upon. Both countries have accomplished much in their management of indigenous issues. New Zealand has begun to right historical wrongs through treaty settlements and to implement bicultural strategies. Canada is experimenting with self-government for aboriginal peoples. Yet there are still many issues to be addressed, with recent statistics showing indigenous peoples in both these countries struggling to balance functioning in everyday life with preserving their cultures. By focusing on the present within the context of the past and future, The Politics of Indigeneity casts light on the constitutional politics in both countries that are redefining the relation |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 62
Page 103
... practice that challenges , resists and transforms . Included as well are the notions of indigenous rights , the principle of indigeneity , and the concept of indigenous difference as basis for constitutional status . And like ...
... practice that challenges , resists and transforms . Included as well are the notions of indigenous rights , the principle of indigeneity , and the concept of indigenous difference as basis for constitutional status . And like ...
Page 204
... practice to this day ( Saldamando , 2001 ) . President Nixon formally announced a policy of self - determination in 1975 to replace the termination policies . The 1975 Self - Determination Act sought to address social and economic ...
... practice to this day ( Saldamando , 2001 ) . President Nixon formally announced a policy of self - determination in 1975 to replace the termination policies . The 1975 Self - Determination Act sought to address social and economic ...
Page 229
... practice ? 2. Do Aboriginal peoples and the government mean the same thing when referring to Aboriginal self - government ? 3. How does Aboriginal self - government differ from conventional government ? 4. Is there a distinction between ...
... practice ? 2. Do Aboriginal peoples and the government mean the same thing when referring to Aboriginal self - government ? 3. How does Aboriginal self - government differ from conventional government ? 4. Is there a distinction between ...
Contents
Preface | 7 |
Engaging Indigeneity | 13 |
Challenge Resistance and Transformation | 25 |
Copyright | |
6 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
Aboriginal accepted According acknowledge advancing Affairs agenda agreement assimilation authority basis Canada Canadian central challenge citizenship claims colonial commitment communities concerns constitutional order constructive context continue Court created Crown cultural defined demands determining difference discourse distinct economic effect endorsed engagement entitlement equal established ethnicity existing federal Fleras foundational framework fundamental groups historical identity Indian indigenous rights individual inherent initiatives institutional interests involving issues jurisdiction land language levels living living together differently Māori models Native needs negotiated organisation Pākehā partnership past political practice Press principles problem proposed protect reality recognition references reflect relations relationship remain Report reserves response result rules schools secure self-determining self-determining autonomy self-government settlements settler shared shift social social contract society sovereign sovereignty status structures territorial tino rangatiratanga traditional Treaty tribal tribes University urban Waitangi Zealand
References to this book
Child, Youth and Family Health: Strengthening Communities Margaret Barnes,Jennifer Rowe Limited preview - 2008 |