The Death of Economics
"Important and ingenious . . . ought to be read by every educatedperson." —The Spectator.
Renowned British economist Paul Ormerod explodes currenteconomic theory to offer a radical new framework for understandinghow human societies and economies really operate. His bold andimpassioned arguments about how and why economics should be recastto reflect the current ills of Western society —includingunemployment, crime, and poverty —are both persuasive andcontroversial. Integrating ideas from biology, physics, artificialintelligence, and the behavioral sciences, Ormerod's groundbreakingapproach is sure to have far-reaching repercussions.
"A clear, concise, and yet sophisticated history of economicthought that should be required reading for Economics 101 courses.The fundamental challenge is to view the economy more as anorganism than a machine and place it in its larger political,social, and moral context." —The Washington Post
"A vigorous, informed, and thoughtful critique of the dismalscience." —Kirkus Reviews.
"Crucial reading for the concerned citizen, which ought to meanall of us. . . . This book is very timely indeed." —TheObserver
"Economics has some battles to fight. . . . Unless economistsimprove their ability to analyze and prescribe in an intelligentway, and to provide a modicum of accuracy in their forecasts, thetwentieth-century pseudoscience of economics will become atwenty-first-century museum piece." —Sunday Times(London).
Results 1-3 of 50
Alternatively, such improvements can be used to produce the same amount of
goods with much less labour. In practice, we see a mixture of these two effects.
The amount of goods and services produced increases, and the amount of labour
It states that the amount of goods and services produced in an economy in any
one period multiplied by the average price of the same goods and services by
definition equals the amount of money in circulation multiplied by the Velocity' of
Suppose that the government or the central bank of an economy can control the
amount of money in circulation, M. Suppose further that, ultimately, changes in
the amount of money do not affect the amount of goods and services produced in
What people are saying - Write a review
THE DEATH OF ECONOMICSUser Review - Kirkus
An old Wall Street adage holds that if all the world's economists were laid end to end, they would never reach a conclusion. Ormerod suffers from no such inadequacy in this vigorous, informed, and ... Read full review
Roots of Economic Orthodoxy
7 other sections not shown