Laws And Symmetry
Metaphysicians speak of laws of nature in terms of necessity and universality; scientists, in terms of symmetry and invariance. In this book van Fraassen argues that no metaphysical account of laws can succeed. He analyzes and rejects the arguments that there are laws of nature, or that we must believe there are, and argues that we should disregard the idea of law as an inadequate clue to science. After exploring what this means for general epistemology, the author develops the empiricist view of science as a construction of models to represent the phenomena.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The end of metaphysics?
What Are Laws of Nature?
59 other sections not shown
accept account of laws aces answer Armstrong atom Bayesian believe best explanation best theories Borel sets Buffon's needle chapter concept conditional probability Conditionalization constraint course criteria criterion defined described discussion Dretske empirical entails epistemology equals equation equivalent Euclidean exactly example experience fact follows frame Galilean transformations give hypothesis induction inference initial probabilities invariant isometry judgements language laws of nature Leibniz Lewis Lewis's means metaphysics Miller's Principle modal necessitation necessity notion objective chance opinion phenomena Philosophy of Science physical possible worlds posterior probabilities postulate prediction premiss Principle of Indifference prior probability function probability measure probability theory problem Proofs and illustrations proposition quantum mechanics question radium rational reason relation relevant requirement rule scientific theories semantic sense simplicity solution sort statements structure Suppose symmetry symmetry argument theoretical toss transformations true truth universals velocity zero