Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand
Humans have always used denial. When we are afraid, guilty, confused, or when something interferes with our self-image, we tend to deny it. Yet denial is a delusion. When it impacts on the health of oneself, or society, or the world it becomes a pathology. Climate change denial is such a case. Paradoxically, as the climate science has become more certain, denial about the issue has increased. The paradox lies in the denial. There is a denial industry funded by the fossil fuel companies that literally denies the science, and seeks to confuse the public. There is denial within governments, where spin-doctors use 'weasel words' to pretend they are taking action. However there is also denial within most of us, the citizenry. We let denial prosper and we resist the science. It also explains the social science behind denial. It contains a detailed examination of the principal climate change denial arguments, from attacks on the integrity of scientists, to impossible expectations of proof and certainty to the cherry picking of data. Climate change can be solved - but only when we cease to deny that it exists. This book shows how we can break through denial, accept reality, and thus solve the climate crisis. It will engage scientists, university students, climate change activists as well as the general public seeking to roll back denial and act.
What people are saying - Write a review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - GalenWiley - LibraryThing
Humans have always used denial. When we are afraid, guilty, confused, or when something interferes with our self-image, we tend to deny it. Yet denial is a delusion. When it impacts on the health of ... Read full review
Other editions - View all
anthropogenic Arctic argues Assadourian Assessment atmospheric CO2 Australia carbon cycle carbon emissions carbon footprint Celsius cent claim climate change denial climate science climate scientists climate sensitivity CO2 level CO2e conservative consumerism degrees Celsius denial arguments denial industry deniers deny Diesendorf Dunlap Earth economic ecosystems Environment environmental crisis environmental problems ethical evidence extinction fact fossil fuels future Geophysical global climate global temperature global warming governments greenhouse gases Greenpeace growth Hansen heat Hoggan Houghton Hulme human impact increase Institute IPCC issue James Hansen major Mark Diesendorf McCright methane Monbiot Naomi Oreskes natural Norgaard notes nuclear power ocean acidification oceans Oreskes and Conway Pittock planet Plimer Policy political population positive feedback power stations renewable energy Research risk runaway climate change scientific consensus sea level skeptics social society solar solutions solve climate change species Stephen Schneider sustainability Sydney things Washington worldview York Zerubavel