Interpolations in the Pauline Letters

Front Cover
A&C Black, Jan 1, 2001 - Religion - 271 pages
In this fundamental and at times provocative study, Walker demonstrates that Paul's letters contain later, non-Pauline additions or interpolations and that such interpolations can sometimes be identified with relative confidence. He begins by establishing that interpolations are to be assumed simply on a priori grounds, that direct text-critical evidence is not essential for their recognition, that the burden of proof in their identification is lighter than most have assumed, and that specific evidence for interpolation is often available.Successive chapters then argue that 1 Cor. 11.3-16, 1 Cor. 2.6-16, 1 Cor. 12.31b-14.1a, and Rom. 1.18-2.29 are in fact non-Pauline interpolations, and Walker goes on to summarize arguments for the same conclusion regarding five additional passages. A brief epilogue addresses the question of interpolations and the canonical authority of scripture.
 

Contents

Preface
7
Acknowledgments
10
Abbreviations
11
Introduction
15
Chapter 1 THE A PRIORI PROBABILITY OF INTERPOLATIONS IN THE PAULINE LETTERS
26
Chapter 2 THE ABSENCE OF DIRECT TEXTCRITICAL EVIDENCE FOR INTERPOLATION
44
Chapter 3 THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN THE IDENTIFICATION OF INTERPOLATIONS
57
Chapter 4 EVIDENCE FOR INTERPOLATION
63
Chapter 7 1 CORINTHIANS 13
147
Chapter 8 ROMANS 118229
166
Chapter 9 OTHER LIKELY INTERPOLATIONS l
190
Chapter 10 OTHER LIKELY INTERPOLATIONS 2
210
Epilogue INTERPOLATIONS AND THE CANONICAL AUTHORITY OF SCRIPTURE
237
Bibliography
243
Index of References
257
Index of Authors
269

Chapter 5 1 CORINTHIANS 11316
91
Chapter 6 l CORINTHIANS 2616
127

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2001)

William O. Walker, Jr is the Jennie Farris Railey King Professor of Religion, Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas.