Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 51Connecticut Bar Association, 1977 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 61
Page 85
... effect that the law , in its majestic equality , forbids rich and poor alike from begging or sleeping under bridges . As a result of a De- cember decision by the United States Supreme Court , it may now be said that the law , in its ...
... effect that the law , in its majestic equality , forbids rich and poor alike from begging or sleeping under bridges . As a result of a De- cember decision by the United States Supreme Court , it may now be said that the law , in its ...
Page 309
... effect discriminates . Under Griggs v . Duke Power Co. , the answer is clearly no . If the practice discriminates , that is enough . Speaking of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , the Griggs court wrote : " Under the Act , procedures or ...
... effect discriminates . Under Griggs v . Duke Power Co. , the answer is clearly no . If the practice discriminates , that is enough . Speaking of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , the Griggs court wrote : " Under the Act , procedures or ...
Page 311
... effect was to prevent blacks from moving into high density , low and moderate income housing in a mostly white Chicago suburb . In the Austin , Texas school desegregation case , 93 the Court reversed a busing order and remanded the case ...
... effect was to prevent blacks from moving into high density , low and moderate income housing in a mostly white Chicago suburb . In the Austin , Texas school desegregation case , 93 the Court reversed a busing order and remanded the case ...
Contents
The Journal Revised Peter L Costas | 1 |
Pro Se Marriage Dissolution in Connecticut | 15 |
Regulation of Tax Preparers Under the | 21 |
23 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abortion ancillary jurisdiction appears apply appointment attorney authority ballot blacks Burger Court candidate Civil Rights Act claim class action committee Congress Conn Connecticut Bar Association CONNECTICUT BAR JOURNAL Connecticut Supreme Court CONST constitutional corporation counsel criminal custody decision defendant defendant's demurrer discrimination effect election electors employee equal protection Equal Protection Clause Equal Rights Amendment exclusionary rule Executive Order exempt fact federal Fifth Amendment filed Fourteenth Amendment governor grand jury Hadley Hartford Hartford Courant interrogation involved issue joinder judicial jurisdiction Justice lawyer legislative legislature limited litigation ment Miranda warnings necticut opinion party person plaintiff police political practice President prior procedure question reapportionment regional school districts Register & Manual Section Senate seniority system Session STAT statements statute Superior Court judge Supp supra note tion Title VII town trial United violation vote voters women