Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 11, Part 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1992 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 49
Page 14
location that will effectively maximize the orifice meter performance for short upstream meter tube lengths of approximately 17 D. TESTS AND ANALYSIS MRF Low Pressure Loop All tests were performed in the Low Pressure Loop ( LPL ) of the ...
location that will effectively maximize the orifice meter performance for short upstream meter tube lengths of approximately 17 D. TESTS AND ANALYSIS MRF Low Pressure Loop All tests were performed in the Low Pressure Loop ( LPL ) of the ...
Page 13
EFFECTS OF TUBE BUNDLE LOCATION ON ORIFICE METER ERROR AND VELOCITY PROFILES Thomas B. Morrow and Joel T. Park Mechanical and Fluids Engineering Division Southwest Research Institute San Antonio , Texas * . ! 19 ba 1 D3 102 mm 1.20.
EFFECTS OF TUBE BUNDLE LOCATION ON ORIFICE METER ERROR AND VELOCITY PROFILES Thomas B. Morrow and Joel T. Park Mechanical and Fluids Engineering Division Southwest Research Institute San Antonio , Texas * . ! 19 ba 1 D3 102 mm 1.20.
Page 14
location that will effectively maximize the orifice meter performance for short upstream meter tube lengths of approximately 17 D. TESTS AND ANALYSIS Velocity Profile Analysis and Models ISO 5167-1980 ( E ) , sections 6.1.3 and 6.4 ...
location that will effectively maximize the orifice meter performance for short upstream meter tube lengths of approximately 17 D. TESTS AND ANALYSIS Velocity Profile Analysis and Models ISO 5167-1980 ( E ) , sections 6.1.3 and 6.4 ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
MEASUREMENT AND METERING | 1 |
OFFSHORE PIPELINE TECHNOLOGY | 53 |
CODESSTANDARDS AND REGULATIONS | 75 |
Copyright | |
14 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actual allowable analysis applied Arctic assessment associated assumed axial bending calculated coefficient considered construction corrosion crack criteria damage defined dependent depth detection determine developed diameter discharge displacement distribution effect element Engineering equation equipment estimated evaluation example factor failure fatigue field Figure flow force fracture frequency function geometry given increase indicated initial installation internal leak length lift force limit load material maximum mean measured Mechanics meter methods obtained occurs offshore operating orifice parameters performed pipe pipeline practice predicted presented pressure probability problem procedure range ratio reduced reference reliability response safety shown shows simulation soil solution span specific standards steel strain strength stress structural Table Technology temperature thickness tube bundle velocity vibration wall weld yield