Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 11, Part 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1992 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 81
Page 226
average safety factor ) , compared to 0.33 . These values represent no improvement in the ability to predict burst pressure . B31G Modified 3.5 B31G failure equation ignores the width of a defect . Extending the B31G approach to more ...
average safety factor ) , compared to 0.33 . These values represent no improvement in the ability to predict burst pressure . B31G Modified 3.5 B31G failure equation ignores the width of a defect . Extending the B31G approach to more ...
Page 242
Any evaluation of safety level should be based on information about the safety level implied by past and present design codes and compared with historical data on reported failures . Furthermore , target safety levels should be related ...
Any evaluation of safety level should be based on information about the safety level implied by past and present design codes and compared with historical data on reported failures . Furthermore , target safety levels should be related ...
Page 246
During this phase , final safety evaluations should be performed concerning specified set of design conditions and failure modes . Recalculation of design cases should be performed based on updated models and redefined design criteria .
During this phase , final safety evaluations should be performed concerning specified set of design conditions and failure modes . Recalculation of design cases should be performed based on updated models and redefined design criteria .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
MEASUREMENT AND METERING | 1 |
OFFSHORE PIPELINE TECHNOLOGY | 53 |
CODESSTANDARDS AND REGULATIONS | 75 |
Copyright | |
14 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actual allowable analysis applied Arctic assessment associated assumed axial bending calculated coefficient considered construction corrosion crack criteria damage defined dependent depth detection determine developed diameter discharge displacement distribution effect element Engineering equation equipment estimated evaluation example factor failure fatigue field Figure flow force fracture frequency function geometry given increase indicated initial installation internal leak length lift force limit load material maximum mean measured Mechanics meter methods obtained occurs offshore operating orifice parameters performed pipe pipeline practice predicted presented pressure probability problem procedure range ratio reduced reference reliability response safety shown shows simulation soil solution span specific standards steel strain strength stress structural Table Technology temperature thickness tube bundle velocity vibration wall weld yield