Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 9American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1990 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 60
Page 406
RISER DYNAMIC STRESS DRILL SHIP DEPTH : 1000 m T : 0,925 sec RISER DISPLACEMENT DRILLSHIP DEPTH = 1000 m T = 0,925 sec VERTICAL HORIZONTAL ( m ) ( m ) 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 AXIAL * ( E8PA ) 2 O. BENDING * ( E8Pa ) 0 2 4 O - 100 .
RISER DYNAMIC STRESS DRILL SHIP DEPTH : 1000 m T : 0,925 sec RISER DISPLACEMENT DRILLSHIP DEPTH = 1000 m T = 0,925 sec VERTICAL HORIZONTAL ( m ) ( m ) 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 AXIAL * ( E8PA ) 2 O. BENDING * ( E8Pa ) 0 2 4 O - 100 .
Page 512
Corresponding densities of 1.009 g / cm3 and 1.013 g / cm3 represent values for the latter part of Phase 2 . common a Two important depth scales exist . One is the Ekman Depth , which defines the thickness of the fully developed ...
Corresponding densities of 1.009 g / cm3 and 1.013 g / cm3 represent values for the latter part of Phase 2 . common a Two important depth scales exist . One is the Ekman Depth , which defines the thickness of the fully developed ...
Page 617
0.246 0.198 0 = Water depth ( m ) 200 400 , 700 1000 0-3 0.149 range - 0 127 mean 0-25 + Water depth = 1600 m 0.204 1000 m 39 mm OD strand Mean axial load = 0.42 MN W = 0.12 AU 。 U 400m Twist ( 10-3 rad / m ) 0 Energy loss per cycle ...
0.246 0.198 0 = Water depth ( m ) 200 400 , 700 1000 0-3 0.149 range - 0 127 mean 0-25 + Water depth = 1600 m 0.204 1000 m 39 mm OD strand Mean axial load = 0.42 MN W = 0.12 AU 。 U 400m Twist ( 10-3 rad / m ) 0 Energy loss per cycle ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
COMPLIANT STRUCTURES | 313 |
Identification of NonLinear Effects in Predicting the Motion Response of Mobile Platforms | 337 |
RISERSMOORINGSCABLES | 345 |
Copyright | |
21 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis applied approach array axial barge beam bending buoyancy cable calculated coefficient combination compared configuration considered corresponding curvature curve damping defined depth determined developed direction displacement distribution drag dynamic effects element Engineering equation estimated extreme factor fatigue Figure flexible riser flow force frequency function geometry given height important increase interaction length linear load marine mass matrix maximum mean measured method mode mooring motion natural Non-dim nonlinear normal obtained offshore operation parameters performed period phase pile platform position Potential predicted present problem production programs ratio REFERENCES relative represents respectively response riser rotating seas selection ship shown shows simulation soil solution static stiffness strain stress structure surface Table tension tests values vector vertical vessel wave wind