## Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 9American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1990 - Arctic regions |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 74

Page 376

5 , is found when current effects are included : L1 = 0.038 ; L2 = 1.16 ; L3 = 0.832 ; and W2 = -0.832 , with a total pipe

5 , is found when current effects are included : L1 = 0.038 ; L2 = 1.16 ; L3 = 0.832 ; and W2 = -0.832 , with a total pipe

**length**of 2.02 and a mean vessel position of 1.07 . The active constraints involve minimum bend radius , riser ...Page 382

Unit Value 3 3 3 Parameter Total riser

Unit Value 3 3 3 Parameter Total riser

**length**Outside diameter Inside diameter Mass per unit**length**( in air , empty ) Moment of inertia Tortional moment of inertia Sectional area E - module 310 0.3571 0.2477 163.1 -6 3.87 10 Result ...Page 472

Parameters that were considered included base width , brace area , leg area , pile

Parameters that were considered included base width , brace area , leg area , pile

**length**, pile area , deck payload , conductor mass , tower taper and flooded height ( near the base of the tower ) . In addition to period changes caused ...### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

COMPLIANT STRUCTURES | 313 |

Identification of NonLinear Effects in Predicting the Motion Response of Mobile Platforms | 337 |

RISERSMOORINGSCABLES | 345 |

Copyright | |

21 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

amplitude analysis applied approach array axial barge beam bending buoyancy cable calculated coefficient combination compared configuration considered corresponding curvature curve damping defined depth determined developed direction displacement distribution drag dynamic effects element Engineering equation estimated extreme factor fatigue Figure flexible riser flow force frequency function geometry given height important increase interaction length linear load marine mass matrix maximum mean measured method mode mooring motion natural Non-dim nonlinear normal obtained offshore operation parameters performed period phase pile platform position Potential predicted present problem production programs ratio REFERENCES relative represents respectively response riser rotating seas selection ship shown shows simulation soil solution static stiffness strain stress structure surface Table tension tests values vector vertical vessel wave wind