Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 9American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1990 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 75
Page 581
SWATHI Model in bow quartering seas peoporoon 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Non - dim . Frequency Fig 8. ... Salvesen N. , Tuck E.O. and Faltinsen O. , ' Ship Motions and Sea Loads ' , Tran , of SNAME , Vol.78 , 1970 4.
SWATHI Model in bow quartering seas peoporoon 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Non - dim . Frequency Fig 8. ... Salvesen N. , Tuck E.O. and Faltinsen O. , ' Ship Motions and Sea Loads ' , Tran , of SNAME , Vol.78 , 1970 4.
Page 583
SWATHI Model in head seas ( Fn = 0.13 ) 3.5 Measured 3.0 Potential Inc. Viscous 2.5 0.0 0 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 Non - dim . Enc . Frequency Fig 27. SWATHI Model in head seas ( Fn = 0.13 ) 20 o O Measured Potential Inc. Viscous 4.0 - 1.6 ...
SWATHI Model in head seas ( Fn = 0.13 ) 3.5 Measured 3.0 Potential Inc. Viscous 2.5 0.0 0 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 Non - dim . Enc . Frequency Fig 27. SWATHI Model in head seas ( Fn = 0.13 ) 20 o O Measured Potential Inc. Viscous 4.0 - 1.6 ...
Page 584
SWATH2 Model in head seas ( Pn = 0.26 ) 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Non - dim . Enc . Frequency Fig 41. SWATH2 Model in head seas ( Pn = 0.26 ) 3.5 Measured 3.0 Potential Inc. Viscous 2.5 0.0 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Non - dim .
SWATH2 Model in head seas ( Pn = 0.26 ) 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Non - dim . Enc . Frequency Fig 41. SWATH2 Model in head seas ( Pn = 0.26 ) 3.5 Measured 3.0 Potential Inc. Viscous 2.5 0.0 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Non - dim .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
COMPLIANT STRUCTURES | 313 |
Identification of NonLinear Effects in Predicting the Motion Response of Mobile Platforms | 337 |
RISERSMOORINGSCABLES | 345 |
Copyright | |
21 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis applied approach array axial barge beam bending buoyancy cable calculated coefficient combination compared configuration considered corresponding curvature curve damping defined depth determined developed direction displacement distribution drag dynamic effects element Engineering equation estimated extreme factor fatigue Figure flexible riser flow force frequency function geometry given height important increase interaction length linear load marine mass matrix maximum mean measured method mode mooring motion natural Non-dim nonlinear normal obtained offshore operation parameters performed period phase pile platform position Potential predicted present problem production programs ratio REFERENCES relative represents respectively response riser rotating seas selection ship shown shows simulation soil solution static stiffness strain stress structure surface Table tension tests values vector vertical vessel wave wind