## Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic EngineeringAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1994 - Arctic regions |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 72

Page 93

Thus the potential at point P is

P,Q) = (nR+ (nR' (4b) where S is the boundary of fluid domain T, Q is a point on

the boundary, and P can be either a boundary point or an interior point (o–2m).

Thus the potential at point P is

**given**by at(P) = |*GG, -Go,(Q)}ls' jqGdT (4a) s T G(P,Q) = (nR+ (nR' (4b) where S is the boundary of fluid domain T, Q is a point on

the boundary, and P can be either a boundary point or an interior point (o–2m).

Page 339

So, the expended time to E incoming energy between adjacent mooring lines

carry out a complete mooring design is normally large despite the F(6)

environmental force for a

occurs ...

So, the expended time to E incoming energy between adjacent mooring lines

carry out a complete mooring design is normally large despite the F(6)

environmental force for a

**given**direction 6 (wind designer experience. In fact itoccurs ...

Page 373

obtained at a

and equal to the expected value

Nu, where the significant wave height exceed the threshold h, is assumed to be ...

obtained at a

**given**site. Due to small COVIT], T. will be assumed deterministic,and equal to the expected value

**given**by eq. (12). The number of annual stormsNu, where the significant wave height exceed the threshold h, is assumed to be ...

### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

OCEAN WAVES AND ENERGY | 1 |

Load Control Method and Its Realization on an OWC Wave Power Converter | 19 |

Nonlinearity in CrestTrough Statistics of Bretschneider Seas | 27 |

Copyright | |

15 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

amplitude analysis applied approach assumed body boundary buoy calculated Circular coefficient compared compliant component considered correlation curve cylinder damping derived determined developed direction distribution domain drag drift dynamic effects energy Engineering equation experiments expressed field Figure flow fluid frequency function given height horizontal hydrodynamic increase installation interaction Journal length lift coefficient lift force linear load mass maximum mean measured method modes mooring motion nonlinear noted obtained Offshore operation oscillation peak period phase pipe platform potential predicted present pressure problem production random range ratio reference relative represent respectively response Reynolds number second-order shedding shown shows simulation solution spectrum structure surface Table Technology tests theory tower turbulence uniform values velocity vertical vibration vortex water depth wave wind