## Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic EngineeringAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1994 - Arctic regions |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 45

Page 210

FIGURE 4.4 TIME SERIES OF LIFT AND DRAG (SCHEWE 1983) Reynolds

Number FIGURE 4.5

C. (b) C. 1 [3] (c) C. (d) C# a) Subcritical Flow. Re=5.1 x 10" b) supercritical Flow.

FIGURE 4.4 TIME SERIES OF LIFT AND DRAG (SCHEWE 1983) Reynolds

Number FIGURE 4.5

**LIFT coEFFICIENT**FOR STATIONARY CYLINDERS (IN. (a)C. (b) C. 1 [3] (c) C. (d) C# a) Subcritical Flow. Re=5.1 x 10" b) supercritical Flow.

Page 213

Curves 16, 18, and 17 represent rms, mean amplitude and peak

respectively. Humphreys' curve 18 of mean amplitude

with McGregor's mean amplitude

Curves 16, 18, and 17 represent rms, mean amplitude and peak

**lift coefficients**,respectively. Humphreys' curve 18 of mean amplitude

**lift coefficients**agrees wellwith McGregor's mean amplitude

**lift coefficient**curve 27 which was derived by ...Page 214

(1981), showed a high jump of the

small Reynolds number range, 4x10°-1.1x10". Their data represent mean

amplitude values obtained from stationary cylinders in flowing water in a water

flume, ...

(1981), showed a high jump of the

**lift coefficient**, from 0.3 to 0.63, in a relativelysmall Reynolds number range, 4x10°-1.1x10". Their data represent mean

amplitude values obtained from stationary cylinders in flowing water in a water

flume, ...

### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

OCEAN WAVES AND ENERGY | 1 |

Load Control Method and Its Realization on an OWC Wave Power Converter | 19 |

Nonlinearity in CrestTrough Statistics of Bretschneider Seas | 27 |

Copyright | |

15 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

amplitude analysis applied approach assumed body boundary buoy calculated Circular coefficient compared compliant component considered correlation curve cylinder damping derived determined developed direction distribution domain drag drift dynamic effects energy Engineering equation experiments expressed field Figure flow fluid frequency function given height horizontal hydrodynamic increase installation interaction Journal length lift coefficient lift force linear load mass maximum mean measured method modes mooring motion nonlinear noted obtained Offshore operation oscillation peak period phase pipe platform potential predicted present pressure problem production random range ratio reference relative represent respectively response Reynolds number second-order shedding shown shows simulation solution spectrum structure surface Table Technology tests theory tower turbulence uniform values velocity vertical vibration vortex water depth wave wind