## Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic EngineeringAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1994 - Arctic regions |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 83

Page 210

D c) Supercritical Flow (Upper Transition): Re = 2.6 x 106 d) Transcritical Flow:

Re = 7.1 x 10° ... • - - - - - * * At the end of the subcritical range the lift coefficient

starts rising. It attains a

and ...

D c) Supercritical Flow (Upper Transition): Re = 2.6 x 106 d) Transcritical Flow:

Re = 7.1 x 10° ... • - - - - - * * At the end of the subcritical range the lift coefficient

starts rising. It attains a

**maximum**value near Reynolds numbers around 8x10",and ...

Page 80

Figure 1 shows that the response is better explained by mmar, the

crest height, than by the

of drag-dominated structures, for which the

...

Figure 1 shows that the response is better explained by mmar, the

**maximum**crest height, than by the

**maximum**wave height Hmar. This is perhaps expectedof drag-dominated structures, for which the

**maximum**force occurs when the crest...

Page 373

The distribution and density functions for the annual

on Model—Aeneal obtained by simulation are shown in figure 12. The expected

The distribution and density functions for the annual

**maximum**base-shear forceon Model—Aeneal obtained by simulation are shown in figure 12. The expected

**maximum**annual baseshear force is estimated to 10.9 MN and the 100years ...### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

OCEAN WAVES AND ENERGY | 1 |

Load Control Method and Its Realization on an OWC Wave Power Converter | 19 |

Nonlinearity in CrestTrough Statistics of Bretschneider Seas | 27 |

Copyright | |

15 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

amplitude analysis applied approach assumed body boundary buoy calculated Circular coefficient compared compliant component considered correlation curve cylinder damping derived determined developed direction distribution domain drag drift dynamic effects energy Engineering equation experiments expressed field Figure flow fluid frequency function given height horizontal hydrodynamic increase installation interaction Journal length lift coefficient lift force linear load mass maximum mean measured method modes mooring motion nonlinear noted obtained Offshore operation oscillation peak period phase pipe platform potential predicted present pressure problem production random range ratio reference relative represent respectively response Reynolds number second-order shedding shown shows simulation solution spectrum structure surface Table Technology tests theory tower turbulence uniform values velocity vertical vibration vortex water depth wave wind