## Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic EngineeringAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1994 - Arctic regions |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 99

Page 96

It should be noted that the slow drift

larger than that for K22=40 tf/m because the ... From those comparisons, it should

be noted that the prediction of slow drift

It should be noted that the slow drift

**oscillations**for K22=0 ft/m are obviouslylarger than that for K22=40 tf/m because the ... From those comparisons, it should

be noted that the prediction of slow drift

**oscillation**near the resonance heave ...Page 117

INTERACTION OF A STEADY APPROACH FLOW AND A CIRCULAR

CYLINDER UNDERGOING FORCED

Charles Dalton Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Houston

Houston, Texas ...

INTERACTION OF A STEADY APPROACH FLOW AND A CIRCULAR

CYLINDER UNDERGOING FORCED

**OSCILLATION**Jianfeng Zhang andCharles Dalton Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Houston

Houston, Texas ...

Page 120

The results for the forced

and 855. At Re=200, the shedding frequency (fso) is 0.098 and at Re=855, the

shedding frequency is 0.119. These values correspond to Strouhal numbers of ...

The results for the forced

**oscillation**calculations are at Reynolds numbers of 200and 855. At Re=200, the shedding frequency (fso) is 0.098 and at Re=855, the

shedding frequency is 0.119. These values correspond to Strouhal numbers of ...

### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

OCEAN WAVES AND ENERGY | 1 |

Load Control Method and Its Realization on an OWC Wave Power Converter | 19 |

Nonlinearity in CrestTrough Statistics of Bretschneider Seas | 27 |

Copyright | |

15 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

amplitude analysis applied approach assumed body boundary buoy calculated Circular coefficient compared compliant component considered correlation curve cylinder damping derived determined developed direction distribution domain drag drift dynamic effects energy Engineering equation experiments expressed field Figure flow fluid frequency function given height horizontal hydrodynamic increase installation interaction Journal length lift coefficient lift force linear load mass maximum mean measured method modes mooring motion nonlinear noted obtained Offshore operation oscillation peak period phase pipe platform potential predicted present pressure problem production random range ratio reference relative represent respectively response Reynolds number second-order shedding shown shows simulation solution spectrum structure surface Table Technology tests theory tower turbulence uniform values velocity vertical vibration vortex water depth wave wind