Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 34Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 10
The Uniform Rules of Evidence were approved after committee of distinguished lawyers , law professors and jurists prepared a compromise version of the Model Code . The American Bar Association threw its weight behind the Uniform Rules ...
The Uniform Rules of Evidence were approved after committee of distinguished lawyers , law professors and jurists prepared a compromise version of the Model Code . The American Bar Association threw its weight behind the Uniform Rules ...
Page 12
This is certainly a desirable step forward and eliminates the mumbojumbo , meaningless hypothetical question which delavs trials . confuses witnesses and fails to aid the trier of the facts The Uniform Rules of Evidence specifically ...
This is certainly a desirable step forward and eliminates the mumbojumbo , meaningless hypothetical question which delavs trials . confuses witnesses and fails to aid the trier of the facts The Uniform Rules of Evidence specifically ...
Page 95
He had some business in Idaho Falls- I would like to point out that our primary concern in this committee was to eliminate the terrible confusion that exists because of the lack of uniformity in the rules of the various District Courts ...
He had some business in Idaho Falls- I would like to point out that our primary concern in this committee was to eliminate the terrible confusion that exists because of the lack of uniformity in the rules of the various District Courts ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities administration adopted amended American ANDERSON annual appear appointed attorney Bar Association believe BELLWOOD BLAINE Board Boise California Chairman client Commission Commissioners Committee conference considered continue corporation counsel County course defendant discussion District District Bar Division doctor effect evidence examination experience fact feel filed further give going hearing Idaho State Bar important injury interest involved John Judge judicial jurisdiction jury Justice lawyers legislation legislature matter mean meeting MERRILL motion move organization passed person practice prepared present President problem procedure proposed question reason recommendations represent resolution result Rules statement statute Supreme Court tell Thank thing Third tion tort trial Uniform vote witness
Bibliographic information
| Title | Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 34 |
| Author | Idaho State Bar |
| Publisher | Capital News Publishing Company, 1960 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |