Proceedings of the Idaho State Bar, Volume 34Vols. 11 (1935)- include Proceedings of the Judicial Section, v. 1- |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 61
Page 39
Isn't it necessary before this association -before that new motion may be considered to have a two - thirds vote on whether it can be considered ? PRESIDENT BELLWOOD : No , that's a substitute motion and doesn't come within that rule .
Isn't it necessary before this association -before that new motion may be considered to have a two - thirds vote on whether it can be considered ? PRESIDENT BELLWOOD : No , that's a substitute motion and doesn't come within that rule .
Page 70
... Court ) and the Boise Flying Service case . In the latter case , at page 17 , the court indicates its acceptance of the “ presence ” fiction . It should also be pointed out that , in a host of cases , the court has considered ...
... Court ) and the Boise Flying Service case . In the latter case , at page 17 , the court indicates its acceptance of the “ presence ” fiction . It should also be pointed out that , in a host of cases , the court has considered ...
Page 96
That idea of the attorney being given notice before the case is dismissed was considered by the committee and was rejected and I think I can say considered seriously , but it was the feeling of the committee in the final analysis an ...
That idea of the attorney being given notice before the case is dismissed was considered by the committee and was rejected and I think I can say considered seriously , but it was the feeling of the committee in the final analysis an ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities administration adopted amended American ANDERSON annual appear appointed attorney Bar Association believe BELLWOOD BLAINE Board Boise California Chairman client Commission Commissioners Committee conference considered continue corporation counsel County course defendant discussion District District Bar Division doctor effect evidence examination experience fact feel filed further give going hearing Idaho State Bar important injury interest involved John Judge judicial jurisdiction jury Justice lawyers legislation legislature matter mean meeting MERRILL motion move organization passed person practice prepared present President problem procedure proposed question reason recommendations represent resolution result Rules statement statute Supreme Court tell Thank thing Third tion tort trial Uniform vote witness